Why does it feel that the evil sides globally are winning. Even evil people are winning. Why?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    and fossil fuels, that continued “subscription” model, is a massive incentive for war and disrupting competing suppliers. Solar does require copper (distribution) and sand plus a bit of silver, batteries just lithium phosphate and iron, and all of these are relatively abundant (sodium as lithium replacement even more abundant). More importantly, once you’ve bought your solar and batteries, you have fuck you energy: secure and independent.

    War on Russia was a last grasp effort to keep diesel refining at maximum capacity, and attempt to capture Europe’s NG supply. Doesn’t matter how much Biden loved US O&G, he wasn’t going to be loved back.

    • goofus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a last ditch effort to recapture former Soviet territory before its oil and gas resources lose economic value.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Simply not credible. Russia has enough drilling sites available to it to serve decades of demand. It set clear reasonable red lines to avoid an invasion, and investing in developing resources on contested land is an extra, unnecessary, risk that makes such investment uneconomic. It is grossly unfair to impute imperialist objective to Russia’s special military operation which was purely to prevent rabid NATO expansionist evil.

        Except for this war, global oil/liquid fuel demand is declining. But use in the war is just a massive, at least 3% of global diesel use, nevermind the terrorist attacks on refineries/depots/supplies. US aligned nations have simply wanted this war more than Russia all along, and it is unfair to fantasize Russian resource expansion as an objective.

        • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          How many NATO countries are former Warsaw Pact that begged and clamored to join quickly after the USSR dissolved? Why did Finland and Sweden finally decide to join NATO?

          If not Ukraine, maybe someone from Georgia, Chechnya, Moldova, or Tajikistan could explain it to you.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Propaganda and hatred is a perfectly valid explanation. Georgia escaped stupidity this year despite propaganda objectives. Moldova succeeded in stupidity. Doesn’t make Russophobia smart, or an objective good, just because it exists.

        • goofus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It is surprising how weak Russia actually is. At this point just about any other nation could come in and wipe out the Russian government.