• 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They add this line earlier in the code:

    Firefox is independent and a part of the not-for-profit Mozilla, which fights for your online rights, keeps corporate powers in check and makes the internet accessible to everyone, everywhere. We believe the internet is for people, not profit. Unlike other companies, we don’t sell access to your data. You’re in control over who sees your search and browsing history. All that and exceptional performance too.

    Seriously, do better and stop needlessly shaming Mozilla.

    [edit] Read the replies to my message. There is good insight. Im probably very wrong here. Leaving my comment intact for context.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Did you read anything else in that PR? Explain why every other mention of them never selling your data has been marked as obsolete come 25th of April? Changing things like

      Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it, and we don’t sell your personal data.

      to

      Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it.

      # Obsolete string (expires 25-04-2025)
      nope-never-have = Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. { -brand-name-firefox } products are designed to protect your privacy. <a href="{ $url }">That’s a promise.</a>
      

      So much for that promise. Companies aren’t your friend.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This should very much be illegal. Companies should be held to the promises they make on their websites, it can’t be as easy as deleting it and pretending it never happened.

        Also, “You don’t pay anything to use it” is still a false statement. You’re not paying money, but being tracked and sold means giving up something more valuable than money - information and potentially influence about who you are as a person - in exchange for access to a service.

    • e0qdk@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago
          {% if switch('firefox-tou') %}
            <p>Firefox is independent and a part of the not-for-profit Mozilla, which fights for your online rights, keeps corporate powers in check and makes the internet accessible to everyone, everywhere. We believe the internet is for people, not profit. You’re in control over who sees your search and browsing history. All that and exceptional performance too.</p>
          {% else %}
            <p>Firefox is independent and a part of the not-for-profit Mozilla, which fights for your online rights, keeps corporate powers in check and makes the internet accessible to everyone, everywhere. We believe the internet is for people, not profit. Unlike other companies, we don’t sell access to your data. You’re in control over who sees your search and browsing history. All that and exceptional performance too.</p>
          {% endif %}
      

      Top paragraph is what they’re changing it to (behind a feature flag) and bottom is what it currently is. i.e. they are REMOVING the bit you marked in bold in your quote when the new ToS is active.

  • hector@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I never donated to Mozilla so can’t really complain. At the same time I’m 17yo so never had much chance of being financially sustainable to afford any monthly subscriptions/donations.

    I’m using Orion on my Mac at the moment and Firefox on my Arch laptop + Fennec on my GrapheneOS phone (need the extensions that are not supported on Vanadium).

    Even if Orion is not open-source, Kagi is really making good software so I think I’m gonna pay for it so it lasts during time. Is there a way to verify they’re not selling data?

    https://kagi.com/orion/ https://kagi.com/orion/faq.html#privacy

    They’re going to open-source someday I think, I really need to start helping them financially because I like what they make.

    Might be an alternative for Mac users.

    • e0qdk@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is there a way to verify they’re not selling data?

      Your privacy FAQ link says they do not send telemetry back – that claim could be tested by using network inspection tools like Wireshark if you know what you’re doing.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        it was removed? thank fuck. it was something like

        surprised it took them this long. <insane slur for women> ruin everything they touch.

        the slur was...

        “front holes”

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Never heard that one before. Not sure I would have even known what it meant since everyone has holes on the front.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            good job unhiding the thing i was was trying to make sure people only see if they feel like they can handle it.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is not a good look, but neither is all the entitled outrage it’s provoking. Nobody owes us Firefox. It costs money to produce and maintain software, and a web browser is the most complicated software there is. Obviously Mozilla has made mistakes but it’s also holding the fort against a complete corporate takeover of the internet. Switching to LibreWolf is a quick fix, it’s not a sustainable solution. Volunteers alone will never have the organization or resources to maintain a world-class web browser. We are going to need to help Mozilla find a better way to viability.

    If only they would offer the chance to opt out of this against a reasonable subscription fee, I personally would jump at that chance.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m already paying money to Mozilla for Firefox Relay but this could make me stop paying altogether. Sucks to be giving them money and still getting screwed.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s wild they would do this since there are forks that are already so good. It won’t take much enshittification for me to drop Firefox altogether.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The forks only keep existing thanks to Mozilla development, they can’t actually maintain a browser engine, just tidy up a bit around the edges. If people drop Firefox altogether and it dies, so do the forks. Not saying that it’s wrong to do that. But it makes me worried for the future.