hylobates@jlai.lu to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoVI is love, VI is lifejlai.luimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageVI is love, VI is lifejlai.luhylobates@jlai.lu to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareAntY@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoVi hasn’t been updated since 2005. Aren’t everyone just using vim or neovim?
minus-squaresmeg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI use whatever the machine gives me when I type vi, I assume it’s usually vim
minus-squarecommunism@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoHuh, vi for me has always been actual vi, not vim. Didn’t know some systems symlink vi to vim.
minus-squaretoynbee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoA long time ago, someone posted advocating symlinking vi to emacs. Evil, but entertaining.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agovim has a limited “vi-mode” that it uses if you call it as vi. so it could still be vim.
minus-squarecommunism@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoOhh that makes more sense. Yeah perhaps, although come to think of it I still need to install vim from the package manager even if vi works fresh out of the box so maybe not?
Vi hasn’t been updated since 2005. Aren’t everyone just using vim or neovim?
I use whatever the machine gives me when I type
vi, I assume it’s usually vimHuh,
vifor me has always been actual vi, not vim. Didn’t know some systems symlink vi to vim.A long time ago, someone posted advocating symlinking
vitoemacs. Evil, but entertaining.vim has a limited “vi-mode” that it uses if you call it as vi. so it could still be vim.
Ohh that makes more sense. Yeah perhaps, although come to think of it I still need to install vim from the package manager even if vi works fresh out of the box so maybe not?