When they let the travel bloggers in we’ll know =P You’d have to be impossibly naive to think the government wouldn’t beat to death anyone who photographed the concentration camps…
Nope, an ad hominem would be if I said something like “you lied before why should anyone believe you now”. The conclusion of my logical analysis was that “you must be corrupt to believe that”. If you’re concerned with fallacies read up on “appeal to authority” because you’re a one trick pony
China’s government isn’t exactly known for beating people to death. The cops murdering a given ethnicity at astonishing rates is an american thing.
You see what you’re doning though? You’re starting from the assumption that the Chinese government is murderous and genocidal, and any evidence presented to you simply can be disregarded.
When they let the travel bloggers in we’ll know =P You’d have to be impossibly naive to think the government wouldn’t beat to death anyone who photographed the concentration camps…
Begging the question
Since you couldn’t be that naïve, you’re being paid right?
Ad hominem
Nope, an ad hominem would be if I said something like “you lied before why should anyone believe you now”. The conclusion of my logical analysis was that “you must be corrupt to believe that”. If you’re concerned with fallacies read up on “appeal to authority” because you’re a one trick pony
China’s government isn’t exactly known for beating people to death. The cops murdering a given ethnicity at astonishing rates is an american thing.
You see what you’re doning though? You’re starting from the assumption that the Chinese government is murderous and genocidal, and any evidence presented to you simply can be disregarded.