• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Tbf, in order for humanity to get where they’re at in the Star Trek timeline they had to go through WWIII: Nuclear edition

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Covid kind of disillusioned me to the whole “all humanity needs is a common enemy/suffering to get right” concept.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Iirc, it wasn’t just that as far as Star Trek goes. Iirc, most world governments and economic systems were destroyed, humanity was a mere fraction of its peak population. Humanity literally physically came together because it was necessary to rebuild.

        Its one thing to have a common enemy/suffering without changing anything else as far as governments and social systems goes. It’s completely different when you not only have the enemy/suffering but to also need to literally rebuild everything from scratch

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The most horrifying possible outcome of a World War is, arguably, there being a definitive “winner”.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s just not true. WWI had a definitive winner in Europe, but not in the Middle-East. And Turks are still killing people unpunished. And Germany wasn’t a definitive loser, despite Entente countries making it really feel that role.