• nichtsowichtig@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    tbh I’d like to see this map with subregions. The differences within a country can be vast. Some of Brazil’s major cities have lower homocide rates than some of the most dangerious cities in the US

    wikipedia list ranking cities by homocides per 100000 inhabitants.

    São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, two cities widely regarded as dangerous by brazilians, aren’t even in the top 50 on that list, while there are several major US cities. So I think looking only at the country-level you don’t really get a good picture of violence in the americas

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Greenland has a population of only 56k, so difference between zero and American numbers is literally 3 kills.

      As they say, statistics are the worst kind of lies

    • WereHacker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Im surprised to see Greenland counted as america. I mean, the yanks hasn’t aquired the country yet.

      • WereHacker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        After the danes loosened their grip on Greenland it got a highly developed state and has some of the best data collection anywhere. An interesting anecdote is that their healthcare system is free, but lacking in certain areas, statistics not being one of them. You probably only notice Greenland now, because it shows up as a part of the Americas.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s a joke about how Greenland often appears on maps like this as “no data”, along with extreme isolationist countries like North Korea and disputed areas like Western Sahara.

          Greenland being “no data” is a running joke, like New Zealand not appearing on the map at all.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No one knows. The creator decided that a source and a year of collection were not relevant information.

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Creo que lo que nos mantiene con bajo nivel en comparación, es el fernet con coca y el mate.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why are Puerto Rico and the USVI colored separately from the rest of the US? If you’re gonna do that, each US state should be colored separately too.

    (Also, it’s kinda hard to tell which circles go with which tiny islands, but if I’m reading it right, wow, that’s a high murder rate for the USVI!)

  • nl4real@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wait, crime in America isn’t actually that high? B-b-but legacy media and Reddit said that I should be terrified for my life every time I walk out my front door! lol

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago
      1. This is homicide. Not crime.
      2. This map is comparing US with Canada and a Latin America. Latin america in general (obvously as seen, there are big differences between countries) is known for high crime and homicide rate. Concluding “not that high homicide” by looking at this nap is like taking a picture of a puddle in a dessert and saying that the puddly has plenty of water.