Not back then it wouldn’t be, though, if we take the veracity of the story at face value. The inclusion of perfidy (dressing up as a civilian or opposing force) as a banned act within the Geneva Conventions was only adopted in 1977, under article 37 of Additional Protocol I.
To be fair: A lot of things that are war crimes today were declared as such specifically because of WWI. Meaning that they weren’t war crimes when they were committed during the war. Specifically chemical agents (mustard gas and friends) had never been seen before, so there obviously was no treaty banning their use until after the fact.
Dressing up as the enemy is actually a war crime.
Not back then it wouldn’t be, though, if we take the veracity of the story at face value. The inclusion of perfidy (dressing up as a civilian or opposing force) as a banned act within the Geneva Conventions was only adopted in 1977, under article 37 of Additional Protocol I.
It’s a fashion crime if your enemy’s the British Beefeaters.
Only if you engage under the enemy’s colors. Otherwise it’s a ruse of war, and legitimate.
Then thank the British for stopping this potential war crime.
war crimes are whatever the dominate military power says it is the other guy is doing
What? Committing war crimes? Germany? Preposterous!
WWI was so famous for everyone fighting a calm and reasonable war with no war crimes
Reasonable amounts of condiments in the air
To be fair: A lot of things that are war crimes today were declared as such specifically because of WWI. Meaning that they weren’t war crimes when they were committed during the war. Specifically chemical agents (mustard gas and friends) had never been seen before, so there obviously was no treaty banning their use until after the fact.
It’s war, and when you are being invaded by greedy bastards. There are no war crimes.
I thought the Germans were the greedy bastards?
Yes, in that case yes. But in current global situations.