• mstrk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I didn’t know that, and it makes a lot of sense. If true, your input on this aggravates the scenario even more. Thank you for sharing!

    • ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If you think that’s bad, and you aren’t familiar with how fucked up we are, let me tell you how school is funded in my state (and it varies by state). You would think that taxes from corporations would pay a lot, and they can, in places that have corporations.

      However, in rural areas, like most of my state in Ohio it is funded by whatever tax money you can generate in your little county (to go with the money from the feds/state that can be impacted because of that testing). So, since ours have little business, it is largely from people’s property taxes. Well, you would think that is fine, and it could be if people cared about things like education here. But, old people tend to see it as another expense and constantly vote down new levies when more money is needed (you have to ask for a vote when budgets need increased). So, the education system is largely skewed in favor of wealthier areas, areas with business, and of course the people that can afford private school.

      • mstrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, I thought basic education was covered by federal taxes. You’re telling me it’s funded at the county level?? WTF?! Why?

        • ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s a mix. A lot of our buildings and that require a lot of local funds, plus operations and that. We all get the same base per student from the feds, but vast disparities on filling in the rest based on where you live.

          • mstrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay, so does that mean each state can make changes to the curriculum? That doesn’t sound that bad to me… you’re essentially like a continent, and amendments to the curriculum could bring some benefits. But I guess the base standards still apply. The one thing I’d caution against, though, is the downgrading of problem-solving skills.

            • ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              they can make changes to their curriculum, but if they can’t pass the standardized tests, they risk losing funding (or having the feds come in to run the school). so, most teach largely to the lowest common denominator.

              • mstrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                they can make changes to their curriculum, but if they can’t pass the standardized tests, they risk losing funding (or having the feds come in to run the school). so, most teach largely to the lowest common denominator.

                Yup pretty bad. Once again, this explains my reasoning in the OP.

                Thank you!

                • ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Oh, for sure. Those of us that can think for ourselves here have been going nuts for decades!

                  We’re also very sorry for the damage done by our fellow citizens and leaders.