• solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Title is fine, but why is it a video? I demand literacy in my PL rants. (I didn’t downvote though).

      • TypicalHog@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a good video tho. But if it gets any more dislikes - I’ll just nuke my post since people in this community clearly don’t deserve it. It will be their loss.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Just as a general note, I appreciate you posting and discussing the contents below but gosh this comment is just like 100% rage bait. Comments like this turn a lot of people off of having a genuine discussion and close minds.

        • solrize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Could you summarize the video to tell people what to expect? That could help. It’s annoying to be asked to watch a video without good evidence in advance that it’s worth watching.

          • TypicalHog@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The video’s message is that Rust is positioned to be the universal programming language of the future - one that developers can learn once and use across all domains throughout their entire careers, similar to how C served that role for previous generations of programmers.

            • solrize@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Thanks. Rust is interesting to me as a systems language but calling it universal seems like overreach.

              • TypicalHog@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                This is why you need to watch the video. It will show you why it’s not overreach but reality.

                • solrize@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  No I don’t think I need to watch it. That’s like saying I should watch TV all day to not miss anything important.

              • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I have several web services built in Rust, along with CLI tools, and a desktop GUI app. I’ve also player with a little bit of Rust in an embedded context and started on a phone app. Not many languages can boast a similar development experience across such diverse use cases, so universal doesn’t seem like much hyperbole.

                • solrize@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Can you name any reasonably popular language that hasn’t been used for all those things? And if Rust is the new C, would anyone say C is universal? I’ve written tons of C. I can say C isn’t universal. Specifically, there is no universal language so far. Serious programmers have to know lots of them.

            • solrize@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Same issue. Does the person have trouble focusing their thoughts enough to write them down, or what? How long is the video, even? I shouldn’t have to click it to find out.

              • TypicalHog@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                No offense, but this is some serious laziness. The video is 10 minutes long, and you can literally take the transcript and dump it into an LLM, and you will have a get a short readable summary in like 20 seconds of work.

                • solrize@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  So post the transcript. LLMs don’t interest me. Remember who it is who is trying to pitch a claim and find listeners. Or just tell me the main idea. If you’re saying an LLM summary would suffice, that’s even more evidence that the video is not worth watching.

                  You see laziness in not watching a video, but I see it in making the video instead of taking the trouble to think out the ideas and write them down.

            • TypicalHog@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              That too. Or they could literally feed the transcript into an LLM and read a summary and main points.