Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m not, I’m pointing out that even that miniscule amount of pushback during the campaign was well received. You seem to be the one opposed to even that

    The Democrats are a controlled opposition, genuine opposition must come from grassroots organization and solidarity. Peaceful opposition backed by militant support is preferred, but I’m completely on board with revolution as well discussed by Franz Fanon

    • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not opposed to pushback.

      I’m opposed to pushback that also pushes out queers and anyone that doesn’t match the corporate/centrist definition of normal.

      Pushback against the nazis, not against “weird”.

      Be weird and proud.

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure, I base weird off of whether people empathize and respect others so I don’t consider LGBT+ weird. I find someone who wants to take rights weird, not people just being themselves

        • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Weird is a compliment. It means you are willing to be yourself in the face of broken societal standards.

          Someone who wants to take the rights of others isn’t weird. The word you’re looking for is “evil” or “selfish” or “authoritarian”.

          • tischbier@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s different types of weird. If this type of weird doesn’t apply to you, then you shouldn’t be offended by it.

            I’m extremely weird and I wasn’t offended by it. Because it’s not referring to me.

            Sometimes we have to set aside our ego and strike where our opponent is weakest. They are weakest when they feel like they are not being included in the “in group.” Weird cuts quickly to that weakness. It has nothing to do with you and everything to do with them.

            If you are hurt by this, then maybe you should work on your introspection and figure out why it bothers you so much. It almost certainly wasn’t meant in the way you’ve taken it. I hope you find growth here.