- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/34484204
Good luck making a Linux user switch to a new proprietary browser.
Is Orion open-source?
We’re working on it! We’ve begun with some of our components and intend to open more in the future.
Forking WebKit, porting hundreds of APIs and writing a browser app from scratch has been challenging for our small team. Properly maintaining an open-source project takes time and resources we’re short on at the moment, so if you want to contribute at this time, please consider becoming active on orionfeedback.org.
Let’s see…
Properly maintaining an open-source project takes time and resources
But why not make it source available? They most likely already use git, so they just need to port it to github. Its not like they would need to review a bunch of merge requests, since they are source available only.
pretty sure it’s like all those projects that say that and never do it, iirc they’ve had that thing in their faq for years
Who cares?
People who want more non-Chromium browser choices after the recent Firefox controversy?
Proprietary from an awful company, I’ll pass
Kagi is a fine company and they’re planning to open source it.
and then the Kagi CEO proceeded to personally harass this blogger.
Wow, kagi is really a trainwreck. Also only 16 employees? My advisor’s business is quadruple that…
Built on webkit? I might have to check it out if they open source it.
“The saying goes “if you’re not paying for the product, you are the product” —unless open-source, I tend to add if I hear someone say it! Alas, Mozilla’s recent faux-pas suggests that even noble projects aren’t immune to the shiny glint of ick.”
…I don’t know if we should embrace proprietary like that just because “firefox did it”.