Sanders is one of the most popular politicians in the US, and his political analysis and messaging remain as relevant and compelling as ever. But while his Tour to Fight Oligarchy is inspiring and important, the broad left badly needs a political vision that goes beyond Sanders.

  • Singletona082@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    No.

    The Left needs to get rid of fucking Schumer.

    Let Bernie retire, because the man was there for the signing of the declaration (pretty sure his signature is just below Adams’s.)

    Let the man retire. Get rido f the Quaislings that seem content to be ineffectual opposition.

    Do stuff other than beg the base for money and give people somethign they can be involved in. Start looking at community efforts. Build ties at the base’s own level so the base SEES the Democratic party Doing stuff locally that HELPS them.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, that’s basically what the article is saying, too. Just a lot more detailed, with a lot more research and evidence to support their assertion.

      • Singletona082@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Always good to have facts backing up what was already a ‘known.’

        Schumer has turned the democratic party into a top down mess that is ineffectual and will continue to be ineffectual because nobody expects the Democratic party to be able to do anything, and for that to change there needs to be a bottom up restructuring.

    • cybersin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So, would you then say “we can’t get more than what Kamala wants if we can’t even get what Kamala wants”?

      No.

    • redhat421@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Surprisingly, It’s sometimes easier to do big things.

      For example: Do social security instead of tinkering around the edges of the existing retirement system.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep, article is well meaning but dumb.

      Idealism is great, but politics requires pragmatism. Which is why people like AOC and Bernie (who are well left of Kamala politically) still told voters to vote for Kamala in the election - she was the only way to avoid Trump, she was the pragmatic choice.

      But apparently we’ll be discussing why it’s a dumb idea to be a protest voter in a very close election for the next four years non-stop.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the language is funky. They’re saying beyond, like take his ideas and go even further, not move away from Bernie. They want more and better of him.

    • arrow74@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      We need a progressive takeover of the democratic party. The MAGAs tranformed the republican party in what 10 years?

      If we have midterms it has to start then.

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Probably won’t happen. The DNC are conservatives and the majority of the US is too. Most ppl are too dumb/uninformed to see left leaning politics is what they actually want

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        *The Koch Brothers et al. used their vast wealth to transform the Republican Party in 10 years.

        The biggest problem the left faces is that money is required for any political action in the U.S., and there is no money for the left. No billionaire will fund 50501, or Our Revolution, and in fact they’ll gladly spend several million dollars defeating leftist primary challengers and suppressing news of protests.

        Our political system is hopelessly rigged. There is no longer any way to use it to save ourselves.

  • rock_hand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    We need more like sanders. Fuck the democrats. I want independents and I want all those who aren’t on board with the Democrat party to recognize it’s time for a change. Especially now in this time of rebuilding while conservatives are in power.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Fuuuuck you. I’ve been hearing more and more from Democrats saying you better get the fuck on our boat, like this is some kind of cult and not a political party I’m tangentially associated with.

    The best part about this country is no one gets to tell me a goddamn thing. You don’t get to tell me “forget Bernie!” because fuck you, I’m an American and I’ll hold out hope for as long as that fucker is alive, especially so when we live in a time when we’re electing people well into their 80s to political power–and he’s still within that strike zone.

    Don’t like it? Then let’s talk about maximum age for service and term limits. But until we do, literally shit into your hands and eat it.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean they are not the same. Corbyn is the real deal, Bernie is a sellout at best, now a sheepdog for the establishment keeping the voters runnung away to 3rd parties.
          No surprise one of them got framed and the other one is still around.
          Bernie can have his platform to do his show to give their corporate party a progressive face, not the 3rd party candidates who get sabotaged by the Dems and which they try to get of the ballots by lawsuits or any way possible.
          They will fight them harder than republicans.
          If you want to compare him to UK politics he would be a labour politician.
          All talk about being for the people yet doing the opposite.

            • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why TF do you need mainstream politicians?
              3rd party is the only option, or stay in the endless loop like you’ve been doing for a few centuries now

              • TylerBourbon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Because the system is rigged against 3rd Parties, the Dems and the GOP have worked hard over the decades to make it all but impossible for 3rd Parties to get on ballots. For example, it can vary from state to state the amount, but 3rd party candidates need to get thousands of signatures in each of the counties they want to have their name on the ballot in. Meanwhile the Dems and GOP have gotten state laws passed that automatically put Dem and GOP candidates on the ballots like an reward for voter involvement in the previous election.

                Getting on the ballots at all for 3rd parties costs a lot of money and time to do. It’s generally why you only really see 3rd parties pop up for the presidential election, which just sort of becomes a joke because it’s usually a nutter like Jill Stein.

                • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  a nutter like Jill Stein

                  While there are better ones and I don’t really follow her, there’s no doubt she’s far better than any of the imperialist genociding psychopaths both sides of your uniparty regime endorse.
                  What makes her a nutter eactly?

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I believe the left needs to start listening to Sanders. This man is a genuine champion. He, for decades, has been shunned by his colleagues, and yet he has never wavered in continuing to fight for all of us. I wish I had a fraction of the courage this man has.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Bernie is like the only leftist rep. You mean the center-right needs to start listening to Sanders.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bernie has many good ideas, but listening more to him won’t get you anywhere. I’ll just copy paste another comment I wrote about this:

      Just voting for progressive candidates won’t fix things. I don’t know if there was any point where that was enough to fix things, but if there was it definitely isn’t now. Therefore, Bernie—who did not, does not and will not recommend any method of resistance beyond simply voting—is incapable of leading a progressive movement. Bernie and politicians like him need an independent progressive movement behind them to win elections; if you put them in charge of the movement they’ll sit around doing nothing for most of the year.

      The US progressive movement needs real leadership willing to take action (and occasionally get their hands dirty) and it needs it fast.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Who would be best suited then? I genuinely would like to know, because I feel like there isn’t anybody right now.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Okay full discloser I am not American and very much not familiar with prominent figures in progressive American politics other than the Squad, so I have no idea. However, it’d likely have to be the leadership of a coalition of progressive groups and third parties uniting for a more equitable and just society and against fascism, in which case they can just elect whoever. I also think the best/only path forward is a broad progressive coalition founding a third party and both competing for elections and resisting in the streets at the same time, so the leadership would naturally emerge from that third party. The leftist activist base whose only direct interaction with politics until now has been to endorse candidates and vote needs to contest and win elections. Unite the left on that basis and you’ve won half the battle.

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, and no. Yes, we do need to move beyond him and seek out fresh, new voices. No, because we still need him to provide his own opinions while he is still here. We can have both.

  • alykanas@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Like fucking milk.

    The left needs to stop with the purity tests and start doing the do the work. Bernie is flawed, as are we all, but he is out there knocking doors .

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bernie should be running “here’s how to run for office in your area” drives on his oligarchy tour. The only way progressives will kick out corporate democrats is by the common person running more. Bernie should be pushing more people to run instead of just getting up on a stage in front of people and being a politician. He’s not a good organizer. Great talker. Horrible at getting people out to vote. Dude couldn’t even get enough people out to vote in the Democrat primary in 2016 to defeat Clinton. She beat him by a larger voting margin than Trump won by last year.

    • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh no, every fuckin person In line to vote with me just said they were voting for Clinton because they were told he couldn’t win. Everyone agreed with him yet I couldn’t convince the 20 people in line that if we all voted for him it could all work. The dnc did him wrong, the media coverage wasn’t great (never is take that as it is), and people thought Clinton was a shoe-in. I dont disagree with your statement for teaching people how to run, but don’t disregard how the dnc didn’t want him there at all.

      • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The DNC definitely didn’t want him there. But the RNC didn’t want trump. Trump was able to convince voters to vote for him despite him being a long shot candidate. Bernie wasn’t. Bernie, if he was a better organizer, would have been able to convince more people to vote in the primary either to outnumber the people who voted for Clinton or convinced the Clinton voters to change to his side. Obama was someone who was able to convince voters to come out and vote for him in the primary and was able to convince Clinton voters to switch sides. Again, Bernie couldn’t.

        I also think a core part of this is just him running for the nomination for the Democrat party despite not in fact being a Democrat. I had many people around me who also agreed with him but voted for Clinton because he wasn’t a Democrat and obviously only wanted to be able to be a part of the party when he needed them as opposed to always being there.

        I personally think if Bernie had always been a part of the Democrat party he would have had an easier time convincing enough people to switch to his side. It’s not like he needed a blowout to win the nomination. This is also why I think someone like AOC would have an easier time running for the nomination since she is and always has been a Democrat.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Trash article.

    Their foreign policy criticism of Bernie is that he told people to vote for Kamala, and she didn’t do enough to stop the genocide in Gaza.

    Like Jesus Christ, people like this are why the Democrats cant win.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      She indicated that she would continue biden’s unquestioning and unconditional support for netanyahu’s genocide.

      You can make your point without downplaying genocide support.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Oh please do go ahead and tell me how much Trump is doing to stop that.

        Oh what’s that? Nothing?

        Are you saying that it was fucking obvious everyone should vote for and endorse Kamala?

        Jesus fucking Christ, anyone who didn’t support Kamala was dumb as fuck. Full stop. If your criticism of Bernie was that he supported the obvious lesser of two evils then maybe you deserve the president you got.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If your criticism of Bernie was that he supported the obvious lesser of two evils then maybe you deserve the president you got.

          Where did I criticize Bernie?

          And anyone who supports genocide is human garbage and will always deserve worse than they’re currently getting. Regardless of how shitty what they’re getting is, they deserve worse.