In my experience learning online is way more effective and efficient.

Why it is not the default option for universities?

  • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I went to UCSB for 5 years and can confirm that I actually learned everything on khan academy for free

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    People ask the strangest things of pseudonymous internet randos instead of subject-matter experts.

  • Kane@femboys.biz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    People still want to see people.

    And, of course, you can make more money when you force everyone to come in.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Online is only really better for lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. As you work your way up from default memorization, in person learning starts to shine.

    Also, a bachelor’s degree isn’t supposed to just teach you hard skills, but also soft skills to make you a leader. It is a lot harder to teach leadership when students don’t have to deal with people.

  • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably because being efficient and effective are not profitable. One requirement for my studies was being present. All those boring hours spent looking out of the window can be counted to study hours. That won’t work when you can work in your own pace at home.

  • SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    learning online is way more effective and efficient.

    Take it from someone who was at university during the pandemic, noooo it is not