A Visible customer was recently the victim of what seems to be a misunderstanding of the company’s automated spam detection system. According to the user, after working with customer service to reactivate an account, the response from the company alleged that the deactivation was due to the account being flagged for excessive text messaging — or spam, as that is against the company’s terms and conditions.

However, there is one problem: the user states this wasn’t spam, but rather they were responding “STOP” to a barrage of unsolicited political messages. This situation has highlighted a potential conflict between automated spam detection systems and legitimate user responses, especially in the context of increasing political text messaging.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hindsight is 20/20 but this could have been avoided by just not replying and blocking the number instead. Replying “STOP” just verifies that it’s a good phone number and that you’re reading their texts. Then they collect that information and sell it to other spammers.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There might be laws against it like there is for mail?

      For instance, you can’t opt out of mail from your member of parliament here, nor political ads that happen around election.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Typically something like a political campaign will use a dedicated texting service intended to send out mass texts. They’re not copy/pasting them on a consumer level cell phone account.