• the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I run Linux daily, Linux isn’t ready, its really not much of a debate. If the average person can’t operate it efficiently then the average person will just stick to mac or windows.

    I’ll admit it is closer than it has ever been thanks to compatibility layers like proton but the average user still can’t figure it out so it still has a way to go.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Honestly, Windows isn’t ready for the desktop, either, it’s just not ready in a different way that most people are familiar with.

      Things like an OS update breaking the system should be rare, not so common that people are barely surprised when it happens to them. In a unified system developed as one integral product by one company there should be one config UI, not at least three (one of which is essentially undocumented). “Use third-party software to disable core features of the OS” shouldn’t be sensible advice.

      Windows is horribly janky, it’s just common enough that people accept that jank as an unavoidable part of using a computer.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          With atomic distros, that updating happens in the background, you don’t have to do anything. It’s like MacOS or Android.

          • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Until everything breaks because the average user held down the power button mid-update because the computer wouldn’t shut down.