I’m usually pretty cautious on stuff like this, I’m in the minority that says the newest games don’t need to get 60fps 4k ultra on the newest GPUs, that it’s okay if you can get medium. Gives games room to future proof themselves.
But this is bad. A mid tier brand new GPU can’t play your game more than 720p 35fps? That’s laughably bad. I’ll wait to get some other reviews before I judge completely, but that’s just utterly unacceptable.
And her everyone LOVES monster hunter wilds. People hate to hate when it’s cool to do so. Wilds still runs and looks like a bag of shit.
It runs like shit, but doesn’t look any worse than MHWorld?
I think world looks less muddy and a LOT less “mesh-y”
…which came out 7 years ago
4K max settings with RT max, and without frame generation, only achieved 30s FPS in the game
So basically 4k doesn’t perform much better than 720p, meaning it’s a horrible CPU bottleneck
There does seem to be an issue with Nvidia in this game (5080 is performing around the 9070 XT).
(Didn’t play it yet and probably wouldn’t before big patches after a year or so, take me with a pinch of salt)
I cannot understand how is this game rated Steam Deck compatible if it is badly optimized? Valhalla was fine on SD but it never had perf issues that bad on current/next-gen. Anyone tried it out on SD (or maybe another handheld)?
Make it uses 32-Bit PhysX /s
Might be an unpopular opinion but after around two hours of gameplay I’m perfectly happy with the performance on my 3060Ti. On medium-high settings it can easily maintain 60fps on 1440p. That is with DLSS of course and ray tracing turned down to minimum.
iYs BeCauSe uPlaY aNd DenUvO
