I would understand if Canonical want a new cow to milk, but why are developers even agreeing to this? Are they out of their minds?? Do they actually want companies to steal their code? Or is this some reverse-uno move I don’t see yet? I cannot fathom any FOSS project not using the AGPL anymore. It’s like they’re painting their faces with “here, take my stuff and don’t contribute anything back, that’s totally fine”

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Here’s a fun idea, let’s fork these MIT-based projects and licence them under the AGPL :-)

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      You could do that. MIT is a very free license.

      Of course, that would only be a useful thing to do if you were also going to contribute to the code.