• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    The intent of the artist

    There is someone using the model and it’s their intent that matters. When looking at a photograph, you don’t consider the intent of the camera.

    The context surrounding the art

    The environmental damage is mostly due to our failure of an energy grid. In any case, you can run these at home with no real environmental impact. It’s also crazy to talk about the impact digital technology has and ignore the impact marble statues or even simple paint has. Same for ignoring things like collage when it comes to copyright issues. You simply aren’t being fair.

    We can look at the context in terms of how easy it is which is actually fair. But that can varie a lot (as seen below) and shouldn’t be the defining factor.

    My own interpretation of the art

    You largely ignored this since it is essentially “the thoughts and emotions it envokes”. It is also arguably the most important.

    We seem to mostly have the same line of thought except I actually judge the piece instead of letting my bias do it. And I don’t call people stupid.

    I also think context and intent is largely missing and can only be guessed for most art we see, especially on the internet.

    In any case, I invite you to view this, read their process and tell me how it has none of the things you mentioned.

    https://makeitrad.xyz/project/etherea/