FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-226 days agoMove the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square204fedilinkarrow-up1508arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1496arrow-down1imageMove the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneFundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-226 days agomessage-square204fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 days agoif you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·25 days agoThis from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ You just keep getting funnier and funnier. btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·25 days ago This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ just because you insisted on looking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·25 days agoNow who is acting petulant?
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 days agocorrecting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance
if you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’
You just keep getting funnier and funnier.
btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
just because you insisted on looking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
Now who is acting petulant?
correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance