I’m on a Samsung S21FE, android 14, One UI 6.1.

But if it works for you, feel free to keep it on the list until you get others’ reports to confirm?

Says it’s made for an older version of android, and won’t let me download.

Happy you liked the suggestion, I’ll make sure to provide a link in the future.

Underhand seems to be outdated.

Can I suggest Drill Down as an automation game? I’ve lost so very many hours to that game.

Lemmy’s silent fart (stink to be discovered).

Thanks Obama

All development is spending superflous resources at low efficiency.

I agree it’s totally tone deaf in the climate crisis, I’m just saying it’s business as usual. Billionaires gonna billionaire until someone stops them.

Currently as a novelty attraction, you go for the experience. This was the same for the other exampled, and is the same for flying cars where they’re being tested.

Even electricity was launched in much the same way.

I think the correct question here is:

“Why? They couldn’t before you were in charge.”

It’s to fund development of commercial grade space travel.

It’s gonna be expensive at start, but as it’s economised, less dangerous, more accessible, demand picks up, more infrastructure, even more accessible and bam commercial air travel/EV/Cars only in space.

The billionaires are much more mobile, they just fund a venture capitalist firm in a new country, or start some other business to parasite in another region of the world.

The only way to stop them is to dilute their power. They have the upper hand economically, maybe time to figure out what other tools the masses have?

Yup

“Essential workers” I seem to recall from the pandemic.

That is precisely the point.

The term “Unskilled labor” is derogatory, misleading, and commonly used to suppress wages. My question is if there’s something better we can call it to reclaim the power of the word, and break the cycle of abuse?

with slightly different boundaries for each respective perspective.

Agreed

Agreed.

Searching through my text books, unskilled labor sometimes is defined as requiring <30 days of training. US plumber’s take more, and as such I’ve changed the example to painter, which doesn’t. I believe all of the examples now can be attained in less than 30 days of training, although longer training is available for each, feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.

In other contexts it’s defined as any low-profit labor, and more updated discourse have changed the division to low vs high wage, although with slightly different boundaries for each respective perspective.

Low-barrier => accessible labor?

Fungible labor is new to me, but wouldn’t that imply an interchangeability that doesn’t quite reflect skill, and even moreso institutional such?

This might be the correct answer tbh.

Work is work, labor is labor.

Agree on all points.

We have 2-3 years to be accepted into an apprenticeship, but we also don’t use the skilled/unskilled terminology.

My question comes from discussions about economics in media and text books, so it could both be simplified and/or narrowly contextual.

Maybe it’s a language issue, I mostly discuss this in economics contexts and experience that the divide is always skilled vs unskilled labor.

Trades never seem to come up in such discussions, but they might be an assumed third party I just never hear mentioned.