• 1 Post
  • 21 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2025

help-circle



  • I do not think they care about regulating it. What they do not want is for it to become widely adopted. Removing it from all exchanges will effectively prevent mass adoption.

    This is why Bitcoin Cash is the better way to go for mass adoption of crypto. It is on all exchanges and you can get close to Monero level privacy with it using CashFusion via ToR.

    It also scales much better than Monero as the stress tests (https://monero.town/post/3601453) have shown Monero fails at around 500k TX per day. The nodes just cannot handle it and this is likely an architectural shortcoming with no easy solution. BCH has been tested up to 10 million with no issues and can likely do much more.













  • The Monero Research Lab (MRL) has decided to recommend that all Monero node operators enable a ban list

    I was under the impression that there was a network attack going on which was disrupting node operations, as has had happened in the past and that is why this post was created.

    My point is the nodes should be able to dynamically determine if misadjusted or allegedly misbehaving nodes are present and block/ignore those automatically without needing to apply a ban-list from a centralized authority. This is a long standing issue and measures in the protocol should be able to govern this, since it has not happened it appears that this is a fundamental flaw that cannot be addressed and instead a ban-list is the only solution.

    My question is what is preventing this from being properly addressed so applying a centralized ban list is not necessary? Is it a whack-a-mole situation where attackers will just tweak some other parameters and get around any detection?