According to another poster its a 15 year old plane.

This ain’t a manufacturer issue.

Same, only 9,998 left to agree today.

You’re dragging my memory back something like 20 years, but I feel like there was one he decided to get naked in summer and just stop for a few minutes. Nothing life threatening at that moment.

Could have been one of the 3 times he was warned winter was coming, but he was too distracted.

It was the sequel, and he’s not naked. He realized when one exploded infront of him and a (frozen) fragment got lodged in his hood

Sorry, was incorrect maths.

1-8%, off by a factor of 10.

Don’t let perfection get in the way of progress.

Expecting everything to overhaul at the same time and uproot embedded systems and culture overnight isn’t being driven, its foolish. Unless you plan on nuking most of the planet its just not going to happen.

So what you are saying us they need all the public support they can get?

Not a ban, a better way of doing things.

Don’t hold one section of society responsible for overhauling the entire global system, but they can absolutely do better in their sphere of influence.

Surprisingly not.

Newest iPhone are around 0.16 T in production, vs computers and monitors sit much higher once logistics and manufacturing, along with lifetime use and disposal costs are factored in.

You’re typing this on an item that used up 10-80% of the average annual carbon for 1 person.

Does that give me the right to inconvenience you as much as I can?

Why, the point is that you need the public on your side.

You would be surprised how difficult it would be to stop a boat with a rope trailing from each quarter or midships on a boom. Get an iron cable around a prop that ship isn’t going anywhere for days, or longer if an alignment is needed.

Massive damage that only harms the shipping company, and be sure to mention that ships and companies with environmentally friendly policies won’t be touched.

I hate how accurate the last part is - im being a bit pedantic as something is always better than not doing something perfect.

Depending on how you did it ports/chokepoints would be much harder to stop as you can’t just send in the cops - boats are much harder to board and stop safely. Some rope, floats, a few fast boats and the right placement would hold a ship up for hours, especially done outside a major city or in a shipping lane.

There isn’t. But why attack the voting public instead of the unvoting industry?

Airlines produce considerable carbon per individual mile but are also one of the industries improving efficiency and fuel usage (because it’s so expensive). Meanwhile ocean liners and cruise ships burn the cheapest, most polluting fuel outside of national borders.

Most emitting per mile.

If you want to get people on board with your cause you don’t do it by pissing them all off.

Blockadeing ports attacks the organization responsible, doesn’t inconvenience the public and creates industrial pressure for change.

Im not telling them not to do it - only think wider and to be strategic with it. They may delay or divert a few flights, at the expense of the wider public having a considerably lower view of their actions.

I don’t think pissing of stressed travelers is the way to do this.

Ports would get alot more govt attention and leave the public alone

This just came to me - you now need to run for president.

400m lap before any presidential debate, speech or campaign announcements. If you do it in more than the country average you can’t respond and first back can start.

Disabled candidates can follow paralympics rules.

The hormone monsters managed…

“Well then who will I share all this treasure with”

Arrrrr???

While I know that’s not how stats work, I find it completely correct to belive that one women gave herself a shock from 4 participants, and 70 men did.