![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
America deserves Trump at this point.
The rest of the world doesn’t, he’ll mess things up far beyond the US. Encouraging Russia/North Korea, weakening NATO, all sorts of trade wars, there’s so much he could throw a wrench in.
America deserves Trump at this point.
The rest of the world doesn’t, he’ll mess things up far beyond the US. Encouraging Russia/North Korea, weakening NATO, all sorts of trade wars, there’s so much he could throw a wrench in.
We can vote someone better in 4 years, but he’s so so much better than trump.
Fun protect! But replacing gas with hydrogen seems really tricky. Hydrogen is much harder to transport without leaks because it’s such a tiny molecule. Electric seems better than trying to still burn hydrogen.
Looks like the biggest one outside China is Inda’s Bhadla Solar Park at 2.2GW.
China’s biggest before this looks to be Gonghe Talatan Solar Park according to Wikipedia at 10.4GW, but I couldn’t find much info on it.
But this is huge either way! Glad they’re investing so much into renewables and hopefully mostly skipping coal and oil all together.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_photovoltaic_power_stations
Or at least not decommissioning old ones. A dollar invested into new solar or wind goes further than new nuclear right now, but we’ll see if it tips more towards nuclear once the grid is a higher percentage intermittent and needs a lot more energy storage with it.
Modular nuclear reactors seem really cool though for replacing large long term generators like at construction or excavation sites.
But you can measure how much of the power of a grid is generated with fossil fuels at a particular place and time. For example, if they have more data centers where energy is cheap like from hydro or geothermal, then the carbon footprint will be less than if they were just using average power statistics.
Or don’t, I’ll just sleep though it.
If they’re early talks, obviously they don’t have plans yet.
I wonder if this is taking into account the energy mix of the particular data centers, or just using the average energy mix?
Manufacturing improvement for dry-coating the cathode and anode. Tesla currently dry coats the anode but not the cathode.
The name makes sense now!
Forgiveness in exchange for favors. All sides play the leverage game.
I’m with you, but the first three only after they’ve been opened.
Cool! But specific energy (g/wh) and cost are always important metrics for adoption. Do they have any info on those?
Well there are a lot of these ships flying around the world all the time, and very seldom does anything like this happen. I just don’t want people thinking that rockets aren’t safe.
Just last week they crashed a hypergolic first stage crashing on/near a village. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/24/china/china-rocket-debris-falls-over-village-intl-hnk/index.html
Is this is what happens when you don’t assume a spherical cow?
Are they counting children? 2.6B people are under the age of 20. How are they counting money for those?
I agree, still not good, but a very useless metric.
Relying on China for green tech long term is risky, but just slapping terrifs on it doesn’t work. The US needs to heavily subsidize green energy to put it on an equal playing field. They’ve done it with domestic oil production since it promotes energy independence, it’d make even more sense for green energy since that’s long term sustainable energy independence.
Maybe Star Citizen can beat it now, it started in 2010 and is still in development.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Citizen