Measured voltage is completely dependent on what is used as a reference. If you were to measure the voltage of a power supply set to +30V with a voltmeter whose leads were backwards (ie positive on the voltmeter connected to negative on the power supply, and negative connected to positive), then you would measure -30V. All this is to say that if you connect your 30V supply “backwards”, you will have -30V. Now, there may be some circuitry in the power supply that only allows current in one direction, and it could be that it’s able to source a different amount of current than it’s able to sink, so be sure to check its manual.

I’ve tried -12V from psu i’ve got lying around but it didn’t work.

I’d advise caution against arbitrary decisions with electronics — both for your own safety and the safety of the equipment.

Please refrain from posting bug reports to this community. You should instead post them to the official bug tracker.

Ah, right. I forgot that they’re based in Sweden. That’s understandable if it’s simply a lack of familiarity with the language, but, still, I would expect a company like Mullvad to at least have one native-equivalent English speaker to look over their public facing English stuff. None of this is the end of the world, ofc — I’m just mildly surprised.

Yeah, it definitely rehashed the trope, but I still think that movie is underrated.

I honestly forgot that this game existed. I remember it being very well made, but I could never fully get into it for some reason.

There are a surprising number of grammatical errors in that blog post. Did anyone proof read it, I wonder?

Orchis Italica

Thank you!

What plant is that?

Am I correct in understanding that you are inferring that the security guards would be likely to do what the police did?

replying in individual comments is stupid and more confusing.

For clarity, would you mind explicitly stating why you believe that atomic comments are intrinsically more confusing?

Regarding that, I found this:

The school district also has its own police force with four officers and partners with local law enforcement, according to the document. Secondary campuses have staff who patrol door entrances, parking lots and perimeters of campuses. [source]

If that’s what you are referring to, it isn’t exactly what I meant. I was more referring to a dedicated static armed security force that watches entrances to the school.

What if the security is competent?

Even if the police were functioning well enough to act to stop a school shooter, there is still the issue of time — it takes time to arrive to the scene to respond to the threat. A competent on-site security presence would be a good first line of defense. Think of a time sensitive scenario like a home invasion — would you rather have the means to immediately protect your home, or would you rather wait for the police to arrive? What if someone attacks you on the street? Would you rather have the means to immediately protect yourself, or would you rather wait for police to arrive? In some cases, no matter how competent the law enforcement is, it’s simply impossible for them to respond fast enough.

Oh. I completely missed that. Thanks for clarifying! I’m still at a loss for what it means, though.

it is apparent that you trust the rich too much

Why?

they want to keep you down to add millions more in their pockets and then they move to take away more human rights.

I do think that it should be assumed that a business only seeks to increase profit, but I have no issue with an business making profit given a fair and competitive market, as a fair and competitive market (ie capitalist) is not zero sum. As for regulating businesses to prevent them from exploiting things to the detriment of society, I would advocate for a Georgist philosophy.

Goodbye.

N

I dont know if they can see my content but I dont think they do.

From what I understand, they should still be able to see your content — you are still posting to the network.

You can always ask the folks on .ml for they make the software.

Ha, well, @[email protected] is a moderator of this community.

So, IIUC, you’re saying that if a user on A browses a community on C, they will never see a user from B?

What do you mean by “it’s standard”? As in that is the intended functionality? It shouldn’t be — the whole point of blocking instances is for the user to be able to, well, block an instance, ie content originating from it no longer shows up.