I don’t even know what master keys are in cryptography.

There would be a difference between explaining just this part of the drama and explaining the whole thing. The latter is what I was saying I couldn’t do. The former was already summarized.

Take my word for it, it’s way too long to recap. We’d have a script longer than the first season of Avatar.

How did you find out you had schizophrenia?

Why are you afraid of water? Can you swim?

I don’t know how guilty everyone is, but I do know that someone’s past, if they keep it in the past like you’re trying to say you’ve done in your quest for improvement, shouldn’t be grounds for ostracism and removal of powers every time they try to attain some kind of goal somewhere. I notice what you describe was explained elsewhere too.

Davel banned me from the transgender community in Lemmy ML by the way, just for merely interacting leniently with you. I looked up the whole “rule 1” thing, it’s BS. I also notice someone tried explaining the whole thing in the Fedilore section, only for them to literally make a new rule (rule 3) that wasn’t there before just so they had a reason to censor or remove the explanation.

Back when you tried going to the original commenter for advice and didn’t get any (either as a diplomatic gesture or due to genuinely wanting to talk to someone), I mentioned all signs pointed to them being exclusionary to you, and considering their continued activity there after the interaction, I think it goes without saying now, which I was going to respond to you saying before seeing that Davel (who one of the things I showed is himself anti-LGBT) banned me from the ML communities.

Funnily enough, Wizards of Waverly Place had a parody segment of Harry Potter. And I consider it even more well done than actual Harry Potter.

You being everyone that isn’t someone else is a 50/50 given at this point. Next people will be calling you the demigoddess/prophet of the one true god.

That’s an old source that misses one crucial detail. One twin is going to be the incarnation of Raava and the other Vaatu. So… more like avatar and anti-avatar.

Personally I would have given the anti-avatar different powers from the avatar if I was in charge of the show, just so it doesn’t feel like a “face yourself” level of Super Smash Bros.

First avatar was Aang, an airbender. Second avatar was Korra, a waterbender. The third and new avatar is going to be Pavi, an earthbender. She is doing the same thing as Korra, with the main difference being Vaatu has his own lineage of avatars now and is the villain (think the Good Twin Bad Twin trope in mythology) and where the avatar gives people very Spiderman-esque vibes (people wondering what her use is in the modern world).

Which church do you go to?

Worship of Trump baffles me. Said worship isn’t even consistent. One moment he’s the second coming of Cyrus the Great, another moment he’s the second coming of George Washington, and another moment he’s the second coming of Jesus himself. At this point, they might as well just max it out by acknowledging he’s the latest Avatar, the sixteenth doctor, the latest vessel of Professor Ozpin, and the most infamous and most anime-named Lemmy mod all wrapped up into one and be done with it.

On a slightly more serious but lighthearted note, it does invoke the question “what counts as a religion?”

You calling people out as a form of jest almost seems indicative of trolling.

It’s not, she’s just using the wording as a joke. In my country, the word “steamy” isn’t even NSFW, it just denotes steam.

As if that makes this any better.

The first one is admittedly vague. She says it’s a reference to the steamed hams meme. She was inviting him over to an unforgettable luncheon.

The second one I don’t know. She might not understand shipping. Mike and Brian didn’t.

Ask again so we’re clear. Do that while I answer how it’s transphobic with three points.

1. The channel misgenders everyone it doesn’t like.
2. It allied itself with an incel who was transphobic, including towards one of the people it was claiming to protect from, ironically, transphobia (all because the supposed suspect was the person the channel was made to slander in the first place, and the person they were supposedly trying to protect from transphobia even called the channel out on that as well as the fact it’s a slander channel).
3. Said person who the channel claimed it was protecting from transphobia has BPD and has mental health issues stemming from his experiences, and could have used encouragement from those same people who claimed were protecting him from transphobia, with Triagonal even sending an SOS signal to the people who were slandering her, but oh no, it wasn’t about the person the channel was made to look bad looking bad, so nothing was said.

Textually legitimate, contextually legitimate, or subtextually legitimate?

These are all different. Plus you actually have to prove their ages and their local legal ages for it to even begin to be legally binding.

How am I slandering by posting the screenshots

I answered this question. You then edited it to include another one.

The person above Triagonal asks for NSFW material. It’s straight up dark web material. Triagonal simply asks for a story about a day out.

This is how the two of you sound right now.

Unedited does not mean contextually accurate.