the administration has left the federal government with no way of understanding if policies are working
That’s a feature, not a bug: the entire point is to make it very hard to see the effects of the regime’s policies, so that they can just claim everything is working as intended and the rest of the world won’t be able to verify it.
Russia has been doing the same for years (well, decades really). They fixed their HIV epidemic by stopping the collection of data on infections
Is there a yoga community? They might be into this sort of stuff too
Third, try to enjoy your life.
The irony
lol no he wasn’t, that was never ever going to happen
Different use cases
Like every conservative, he just hates that people have empathy for anybody but them
Yeah a friend of mine accidentally walked into the crossfire of what turned out to be a nearly 10-year-long beef between two badly medicated bipolar people that had reached some pretty fantastic and frankly scary proportions. Stalking and harrassing the shit out of each other, or the other’s employers, friends, acquaintances, random people who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, etc. etc. Justice system’s been involved multiple times.
Orpon kuuma mikrofoni -tapaukseen, ks esim https://www.iltalehti.fi/politiikka/a/f8d5241f-0da4-4ad9-a1fc-5209f25abad4
That’s… reassuring.
This reminds me of that scene from Fight Club:
“Which bank do you work for?”
“A major one”
Right, which just calls into question how “anti-woke” it is. Does that count as a critical approach to LLM outputs to you?
I’m not saying this just based on the headline: it’s not like the article itself displays anything that I’d consider a critical approach to LLMs. Just because I don’t agree with your interpretation of the article doesn’t mean I didn’t even read it.
Weighing the real estate magnate’s dealings with both pre- and post-Soviet officials, the KGB, and the Russian mobs, Grok said that although there is no “smoking gun [that] proves direct control,” there’s a good chance that Trump is a “useful idiot” for Putin — especially given that “Trump’s ego and debts make him unwittingly pliable.”
“Adjusting for uncertainty and alternative explanations (e.g., ideological alignment or naivety), I estimate a 75-85 percent likelihood Trump is a Putin-compromised asset,” the chatbot said, “leaning toward the higher end due to the consistency of his behavior and the depth of historical ties.”
This just reads like Grok is any other source and not an LLM.
I’ve become much more flexible in my thinking and beliefs the older I’ve gotten, and statistically young people are much more likely to have extreme positions on things.
If anything, you’re probably going to have a worse time convincing young people who think they know everything, than older people who understand that they don’t.
They should, but they’re human, and this is just such a quintessentially human thing – mindless hate and brutal torture are features, not bugs.
Well, headlining the article as “Elon’s Grok Chatbot Calculates Probability That Trump Is a Russian Asset” definitely makes it sound like it’s supposed to be a calculation of a probability and not just funny as hell.
Oh suddenly we think "AI"s are trustworthy?
I mean Trump definitely is a Russian asset, but what Grok says is neither here nor there
Hmph, not in sci-hub yet
Just your run of the mill neo-Nazi look, like RIchard Spencer:
Can I book you for parties? You’d be a great hit
Wait, saying that it would destroy Hungary was supposed to dissuade us from letting Ukraine in?
Shit, that’d be two birds with one stone.
Seems like a run of the mill liberal whose information about “the left” comes from far right talking points:
Like, what the fuck is this shit?
The discussion about “family values” might seem like this if you only listen to what conservatives are claiming about what “the left” wants.