john_brown [comrade/them]

You could agree with me completely and still be incapable of defending your worldview. I didn’t stutter, I said I don’t need to know your worldview and I meant it.

So you think Mao decided starving his own people benefited him? Why?

Do you understand the difference between causing a famine unintentionally and doing mass murder?

believing that might require some kind of examination of their own beliefs, and they know for sure those are held up by rickety vibes and baling wire

So people who comment a lot about politics aren’t bots, but people who post threads are? Break that down for me, Columbo.

I don’t need to know your worldview because I recognize your defense mechanism. Nobody who accuses dissenting opinions of being bots ever has a well thought out worldview. You know as well as the rest of us, deep down, that you’re not identifying bots or paid users. You’re just incapable of creating a coherent argument against people with other politics, and this is your “out” to avoid coming to grips with it.

mor active users post like once a week.

You just posted multiple times in this thread, what are you, grok??

Nothing says “fragile worldview” quite like claiming everybody who disagrees with you is paid to do it

Do the people around you find you as embarrassing as you present on the internet?

yes you did

How many names do you have? Is it just one name, like, “Joe”, or “Susan”, or “Scorpion” if you’re a cool dude in a leather jacket? Or maybe do you have more than one name, like maybe a family name, because just the one name isn’t really specific enough? On the edge of my seat, please let me know.

Oh no, you’re on to me

I have independently verified that you’re a clown.

I didn’t request podcasts, I have asked you many times now for the names of the people making the claims but curiously you refuse to provide them. It’s almost like you know it’s bullshit and you’re afraid of anybody checking up on it.

you linked to podcasts you clown

but I’d rather share independently verified rather than anecdotal information.

Correction, you’d rather link to podcasts instead of providing actual information

So you’re scared of anybody being able to check up on your claims and won’t provide an actual full name of someone making these claims to prevent anybody from being able to investigate the individual. You’re gonna need to work on your tactics because this is pretty pathetic, but if you keep it up I am sure somebody at USAID would take a look at your resume once their budget has been sorted out again.

You don’t have full names?

Are you playing dumb or just not getting it? I asked you to show me an individual making the claims who has not been paid to do so. You linked to a fuckin podcast, instead of providing a name. I am once again asking for the name of the individual making the claim. This should be extremely easy for you if you’re not just making shit up and wishcasting.