I really disagree with this. Her nose job, which was initially good, no longer fits her face. Her nose is super straight and it doesn’t really flow or move in the same way the lines of her face do. She also has some more asymmetry in her face (that probably can’t be changed with plastic surgery because it relates to eye position and bone length) in part due to aging and her nose isn’t at the right angle to fit the different planes of her face.

This is probably the effect of aging, not more and more plastic surgery. She probably had 1 nosejob possibly with cheek implants and has occasionally gotten lip fillers and possibly cheek fillers.

So at this point, Laura Loomer would look better with a revision rhinoplasty that made her nose look a bit bigger, more flow-ing, and less straight. The bridge could be at a slightly different angle to fit her face. Her nose would look worse but the overall flow and feeling of her face would be much better. If she has cheekplants, and I’m not sure if she does, she should take those out if she can.

So doing that would be expensive, time-consuming, and hard to do. Revision surgeries are riskier and cost more. They have longer recovery time and much more can go wrong. Additionally, it’s hard to made a nose that is “too straight” flow in a more natural way because you sort of would have to intentionally make the nose look a bit worse. She could do it and end up looking worse, even if she tries to be smart about. It would probably also cost a lot, probably many tens of thousands of dollars.

She is a political commentator, there’s no indication she’s super rich. She probably did the initial surgeries because she thought they would help her in her career and make her more attractive and doing revisions is expensive, has risks, and would require downtime.

I don’t agree with her politics, but this is not dysmorphia. My guess is it could be the opposite: she may realize a revision surgery could be beneficial but is concerned about additional costs and risks and so hasn’t done anything, instead just accepting things as they are.

thanks for being the first person or one of the few to understand the concern

they actually didn’t say. i think i remember the webpage they sent me to said free tablet and yoga mat, but i didn’t know. i wasn’t thinking about it because i figured i could root or disable all permissions.

it feels invasive in principle. If they had said it was a managed device, I never would have accepted it.

data brokers do not know which devices are nearby me. i use linux. no one collects anything where i am. and now databrokers are able to know which specific devices are around me, meaning that if I buy a smart device in cash and set it up, data brokers will be able to infer it’s me based on the proximity of nearby devices collected by this health tablet. that actually is invasive, data brokers and smart devices are that good at inferences, and i feel like I was duped into this.