• rtxn@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Tell the Rabbit AI landwaste thingy to describe the image, then feed the result into Midjourney.

  • x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m the ffmpeg guy. It’s the pandoc of binary media, except it actually does do everything.

    Hmmm. I need to write an PR for converting mardown to jpeg.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Why is ffmpeg Chaotic? I use it for video edits sometimes, too. Like if you need to stack videos in rows and columns, FFMPEG is my go-to.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Using the video tool for a single still image is a bit chaotic, but it’s still a tool made for the job so it’s good. Chaotic Good. Makes sense to me.

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I needed to crop a couple of images a few days ago and completely forgot about graphical editors. I spent like 10 minutes repeatedly using imagemagick with slightly tweaked parameters until I liked the crop

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      people hate webp but the issue is more on windows and partially on Google

      Google killed jpegxl (webp but compatible) which would’ve made everything easy to work with, and Microsoft didn’t even bother adding webp as a format which is just crazy

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s not on the chart because it doesn’t convert it. It only renames it. A JPEG ending with .png is still a JPEG

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        One could argue that they have converted it, but it was done poorly.

        In a similar sense, the screenshots and phone photos are not conversions. They are entirely new images.

        • communism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I would say that’s not comparable. One process (screenshotting or taking a photo as PNG) results in a PNG as the output. The other process results in an image of the same format as the output. I guess at best you could make a philosophical argument as to what is ontologically a PNG: is it something that ends in .png, or is it a file that follows the PNG format? I think most people would say the latter, so if we say the definition of something is just a description of how it’s used, then the former process results in a PNG and the latter process does not.

          Also, how is screenshotting an “entirely new image” in a way that e.g. putting it into GIMP and exporting to PNG isn’t? That’s doing the same thing. You know there isn’t some “canonical” JPEG to PNG algorithm, right?

      • somenonewho@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        You know who used to do that? Microsoft Teams. I would take photos with my phone and upload them via Teams, Teams would display them just fine but saving them teams would name them .png (even though they were jpeg) and I couldn’t open them with the gnome image viewer (this is also how I found out that the image viewer prioritizes extension over magic byte (which seems stupid to me).

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        that would be renaming the file extension but keeping the same format opening it up in an app that breaks it totally, then saving that and sharing it with a Windows user and spending an hour with them trying to make it work because they have to see it!!!

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    For one or two images, I am true neutral. If it is a whole set, anything but lawful good would be stupid or Windows user level.

  • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    What’s always missing is nomacs - the best image viewing and light editing toolkit app on linux.

    Nobody ever mentions it. Why is that? Why? It supports all the formats. It has the best slideshow options. The UI is as minimal or as informative as you set it to be. WHYYYYYY DOES NOBODY TALK ABOUT IT??? Who paid you to be silenced?

    (and yes, it can convert the formats)


    https://nomacs.org/

    https://github.com/nomacs/nomacs

    • Metz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I used it for a long time years ago and it is indeed very great. But its only maintainer stopped around 2021/2022 because he got a new job or something along that line. As far i see he partially returned later but is still looking for more contributors. so the future of the project is not really secure. e.g. see https://github.com/nomacs/nomacs/issues/987

      So more eyes on Nomacs would be indeed good.

      • Kanda@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s so crazy to me that guy was unemployed and is spending his days making a high quality software product for free

      • 56!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Doesn’t really seem like the sort of thing that needs regular updates though. Should keep working fine while Qt6 is available.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s missing the “take a screenshot on your mobile phone” (which drives me nuts when people do this instead of sending me the link or the original photo).