I posted last week about building a NAS, and on friday I saw that the Jonsbo N4 case I had been eyeing for a while was in stock at a good price.

So now I am looking for a motherboard to base my system on, which seems to be a bit difficult.

I need an mATX or ITX board that can handle six SATA drives and also have an NVME slot for a boot drive.

Performance, I value power efficiency more than super high performance, and am on the fence between Open Media Vault or TrueNAS, I like the familiarity of Linux, but I do value the features of ZFS.

If I end up on TrueNAS I may run a VM in the hypervisor from time to time, mostly just for testing.

The NAS will not be an HTPC, but will serve media through SMB and possibly NFS later.

Cooling could be a bit of an issue as the case does not have a lot of space for a cooler

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    you want to use a hardware raid system with redundancy imo

    uses drives up but your shit will be a lot safer until you back it up onto something you can keep offline

    which mobo would that be? idk I just work in data storage as a system admin and this is what I’d start at

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Why use a hardware RAID? If your controller dies, your data is inaccessible. Software RAID with something like ZFS or Btrfs is safer.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        what? are you kidding or just being dumb? you can restore a raid on different hardware with the hardware configuration tools

        as long as the drives and the raid are fine, it will rebuild

    • stoy@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      As it is right now, I have zero redundancy, just my media spread across two HDDs, a future plan is to have two NAS units, the primary unit that I access from my machine as normal, and a separate unit that runs rsync or borgbackup from the primary unit every night.

      At this moment I don’t want perfect being the enemy of good.

      • Dran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I run clusters of both LSI-based hwraid and zfs at work. I strongly recommend zfs over hwraid. The long and short of it is hwraid hasn’t kept up with software solutions, and software solutions are often both more performant and more resilient (at the cost of CPU/memory).

        For homelab scale, zfs is definitely the way to go, especially for archive data.

        Wendel wrote up a pretty good guide for those looking to understand what makes zfs so good if you want to dive deeper. https://forum.level1techs.com/t/zfs-guide-for-starters-and-advanced-users-concepts-pool-config-tuning-troubleshooting/196035

        • stoy@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, I am a bit weary of hwraid since I have no experience with it, I have some experience with software raid.

          My initial plan was going with Linux set up an mdadm raid and run an LVM on top of it, though the more I think about it, it feel like more of a lab/experiment scenario, snd I may get another NAS build to lab with.

          As it stands now, I’ll probably go with TrueNAS and ZFS since it will be running in “prod” at home.