• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ive told people this many times, we need to create more room for failure. From school, to jobs, to building businesses, to loans, to health.

    If we can try something because if we fail we can try something else, we would find a hell of a lot more to care about in this world.

    And the most important thing we would care more about is ourselves

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I cannot agree enough with this statement and especially love your closing. We definitely don’t tend to be able to take enough time to really care for ourselves and try and fail at new things.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Science and academia, too. There’s way too few papers being published about failed experimemts. “I thought A, so I did B in order to achieve C, but it didn’t work out because of D.” is a very useful result.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It make me really sad when I learned that James and Adam were not friend.

    James said their relationship doesn’t really extend beyond the show.

    • Shard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s fine and I think its pretty much the perfect example of a solid professional relationship (no need to be buddies or “like a family”) and what greatness can be achieved when you work with same endgame in mind. They may have disagreed plenty but only because they wanted to achieve the best outcomes possible.

      While they are not friends, if you follow Adam on youtube, you’ll realize there is a huge amount of mutual respect between the two, even to this day.

  • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is what conspiracy theorists don’t get. The world’s scientists are not skeptical of your claims that water has secret spiritual memory because they hate you, they are skeptical because the claim you make, if it were true, would be so important and world-changing that they want to be absolutely sure of it before they endorse it.

    The difference is that, to a scientist, “this would be amazing if it were true” is not a good reason to believe it anyway

    • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or at least use classical conditioning to associate the I’m wrong feeling with the impending new cool facts feeling.

    • Zozano@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I remember being stubborn, being proved wrong, continuing to be stubborn, and being proved wrong even harder, in front of others.

      It’s such a pathetic and embarrassing feeling to be that wrong.

      I don’t want to be wrong a moment longer than I need to be.

      There’s no shame in being corrected, but there is in holding on to shit ideas.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is the right attitude more people should have. But all too often, when people are proven wrong, they genuinely believe that it must be the other person/group, because they cannot accept the emotional consequences of being wrong.

        I know that I’ve had a hard time learning this because growing up I was never held to account for my actions on an emotional level. It was the 80s and 90s, and adults at that time would either shrug it off, or go straight to the nuclear punishment of corporal punishment. Never once would they sit down and talk to you about why what you did was wrong and how to do it better next time. I, anecdotally, believe that a lot of genx suffer this same way. They simply haven’t learned that there is a better way.

        • gibmiser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, talking to kids and explaining things to them takes time, and it’s basically work. How inconvenient.

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Also, you have to know what a better way to handle a situation is. If someone’s the type of person who hits a kid for misbehavior, maybe they don’t know how to do better.

            My husband and I are in our mid thirties, and are actively holding off on kids until we feel like we’ve gotten better at managing our emotions. Our parents had kids much earlier, and ended up exercising their emotional dysfunction on small children

            • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I could be completely wrong, but my life experience so far suggests that the best way to get better at something is to put yourself into situations where you have to actually practice the skill. I’ve been fostering cats and kittens for a few years, and I think it has really pushed me to learn how to manage my emotions better.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Plus being able to figure out a semilegitimate excuse to blow stuff up. “This could be very dangerous so we’re going to do several things to make it safer. That’s teaching safe lab techniques, so it’s educational!”

  • fossphi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sometimes there’s a twitch stream of random mythbusters episodes. It’s so fun.

    I wish they came back :/

    • rolaulten@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      We need less entertainment that runs forever and more that has a plan for how long it should be.

      In this case it ran as long as it was feasible, then a little longer and then they where done.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think Mythbusters is a little bit of a different case than something more narrative. There are always new myths to bust; every generation needs something that makes science cool. I guess now that’s a role mainly filled by various YouTubers.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s amazing to me that Discovery hasn’t tried to bring Mythbusters back. Instead they double down on Ancient Aliens and Pawnstars garbage.

      • Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you need you fix Adam savage is very active on YouTube and is just a wonder human being. It’s not MythBusters but Adam was a light during Covid and someone I put on regularly on YouTube.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, I watch him. It’s not Mythbusters, but it’s still entertaining usually, even when he’s doing the most boring things. It really shows how good he was as an entertainer.

          • rosa666parks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            My favorite thing about Adam’s videos is the way they are edited, they leave in some silence so you can see Adam’s head gears working as he’s solving a problem. It sorta feels like we’re solving the problem with him.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Real Science attracts smart people who want to learn a thing or two about the world, Fake Science attracts the kind of gullible kooks you can sell snake oil and orgonite devices to… and I say this as someone who “wants to believe”

        Same reason why scam e-mails and telemarketers intentionally leave big gaping holes in their stories while using dozens of spelling errors. If you’re the kind of person who can notice things like that, you’re too smart to buy what they’re selling.

      • seatwiggy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m pretty sure they did try to bring it back but it wasn’t as popular because it wasn’t Adam and Jamie

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I remember during the run of Mythbusters either Discovery or History or one of those tried to launch another show to cash in on Mythbusters’ success, it was called Smash Lab, and it’s clear the creation of this show involved a pie chart titled “Elements of Mythbusters by screen time” and there was one pie wedge labelled “explosions.” It didn’t last long IIRC.

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          From listening to podcasts done by people involved in those attempts to bring the show back, it seems the show runners/studios in charge didn’t understand what made the show good and tried to steer their recreations in bad directions. It does seem like most every host they brought on had good intentions and skillsets, but were held back in some way.

          • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you’re talking about Adam and Jamie, this is not true and has been repeatedly debunked by both of them.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Adam and Jamie were awesome, but I’m certain there are some passionate makers or something out there who could fill the role. It wouldn’t be the same, but it could be it’s own thing. Whoever the new hosts were must have just been the wrong casting, but also I don’t know how much Discovery cared because I didn’t know about it and I was a huge Mythbusters fan. I guess I just didn’t pay attention because Discovery had already killed everything that was worth paying attention to them for by that point.

          • Montagge@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s been a while since I watched them but I recall feeling like the new hosts weren’t genuine. It felt more like a YouTube reaction video than an episode of Mythbusters.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Mythbusters fundamentally needs to capture the joy of engineering more than the joy of explosions. (Not that those aren’t fun too.)

      • QuantumStorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah its a real monkeys paw situation too. Will they be able to catch that same lightning in a jar again without the same cast?

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          If they understood what made it great, maybe. They don’t though, and definitely won’t care to try.

    • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You should checknout SMyths, fan edits that remove the cutting back and forth between stories so you get one myth at a time, and that cut out the repetitive narration meant for people joining mid-episode. Much nicer viewing

  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just looked up the elephant vs mouse segment. The way the elephants reacted, I kinda feel like they’re being cautious because they recognize a harmless lil animal and don’t want to step on it. Like they behave pretty much exactly how I do when I see a little spider or frog or cricket or something. like “whoa there buddy, you dont wanna be under my feet”

  • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would say escaping from quick sand and escaping from an alligator chasing me were two major concerns in my childhood. LoL, global climate change was maybe not even on the list, for which I will curse the petroleum industry.