ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoIf there was about to be a long term internet outage and you have limited storage, is it better store fewer Movies and TV shows in high resolution, or store more of them but in lower resolution?message-squaremessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareIf there was about to be a long term internet outage and you have limited storage, is it better store fewer Movies and TV shows in high resolution, or store more of them but in lower resolution?ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareoccultist8128@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agois it better than the H265 alone without changing the container format?
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·14 hours agoH.265 isn’t a container format, it’s a encoding format. You have to have a container to hold the encoded video stream, whether it be MKV, MP4, etc.
minus-squareoccultist8128@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-212 hours agoi know. that’s what i’m asking. which one is better, H265 with MP4 as container (since it’s the standard) or MKV as container… i do transcoding a lot but haven’t experienced using MKV as the container. that’s why i’m asking.
is it better than the H265 alone without changing the container format?
H.265 isn’t a container format, it’s a encoding format. You have to have a container to hold the encoded video stream, whether it be MKV, MP4, etc.
i know. that’s what i’m asking. which one is better, H265 with MP4 as container (since it’s the standard) or MKV as container… i do transcoding a lot but haven’t experienced using MKV as the container. that’s why i’m asking.