The problem I see with the West addressing this is that for that to happen, we have to stop viewing the West as a single unitary thing, both in terms of nations and of social class. You can’t blame the whole collective West while expecting them to join your side of the neocolonialism debate.

And the flip side is that the whoel subject cannot really be talked about without looking at geopolitics as a whole. Neocolnialism is practiced by all major and some minor powers today, and it is the exact same dynamic playing out in Ukraine that is playing out in Palestine, with the small difference that Ukrainians had a headstart of a mostly functional country in the first place so they can defend themselves from their aggressor more effectively.

Calling for the US to stop backing genocide only makes your argument anti-colonialist if you oppose other attempts of colonialism, like Russia trying to retain its colony Ukraine. Russia has been propped up just as much by its colonies as the US, except they never really made it to prosperity. TBH the current best hope for a great power that is independent enough not to be another colony to emerge, that does not directly need its colonies to even survive, is if Ukraine joins the EU. In that case, I think there may be a future when the French get out of Africa like how the British got out of much of their colonies.

My point here is that the statement that “the US-led West is the biggest exploiter and beneficiary of neocolonialism” might have been true between like 1990 and 2010, but before that the USSR was just as big a contender, and today’s China and Russia are also trying to either set up their new colonial empire, or trying to reclaim some semblance of their old.

Not to mention that the “US-led West” has died with the re-election of Donald Trump.