• tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I have — at one point or another, I’m pretty sure that I’ve tried every Linux virtual terminal program out there that’s been packaged for major distros in the past twenty years — but it was some time back, and I don’t remember specifics. For me, time to start and text throughput was a pretty dominant factor, and urxvt (for X11) or foot (for Wayland) ranked highly there.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Don’t take this as zinging alacrity as unusual or whatever. I mean, I don’t care about tabs, for example, because I do “tabs” inside the terminal, using tmux, so I’m fine using something like urxvt, foot, or alacrity, but many people don’t, and care a bunch about having multiple tabs in a virtual terminal program. Time to open terminals, which I care about, may not matter much if you launch them with the mouse instead of whacking a key combination – by the time your fingers get back to the keyboard, the terminal is probably up.

          Most virtual terminal programs work more-or-less the same way, outside something exotic like cool-retro-term, and you’ll be fine with choosing any of them.

          • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah I didn’t read it as a negative at all, but thanks for explaining anyway. Never got to the point of seriously trying tmux yet, but I will eventually. I understand it does more than just “tabs in your terminal”.