. The race of a voice actor doesn’t matter

. It is possible to wear yoga pants because there comfy

. You don’t need to shower everyday

. It is possible to crossdress/be gender non-conforming without being trans

. Monty Python is very overrated

  • Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    The hill upto the finishline on my local park run this morning was way harder than usual, so (almost) that one today!

  • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago
    • ISO 8601 (e.g., 2025-05-23) are the only correct date formats.
    • We should stop using time zones and daylight saving.
    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      We should stop using time zones

      Check this out. I’m a business with at least one office in every US state. You want to know when my New York office opens so you can come by. Instead of seeing “Offices are open 9 AM to 5 PM” You now need to check every office… by state… by city? Time zones would be helpful even if we all used GMT, so that you could easily determine which time zone a business is in to set a reasonable time to be open.

      DST can fuck off though.

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s a pretty specific use though. A case like this only makes sense because we all somehow decided 9AM - 5PM is a standard business time, when society could benefit from having different business/services open at different times.

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          That was an example of a situation where time zones make sense. Any time it is important where the sun is in the sky, the time that it occurs will differ depending on where you are in the world. When is lunch break? When do backups run? When can you see the eclipse? If we weren’t in an interconnected world, it wouldn’t matter much but we need some convention to communicate information that is dependent on where the sun is, as that very often dictates human activity.

          It seems like a universal time makes sense but I can’t think of a way to get around the fact that activity will vary according to timezones anyway.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Stop using timezones? So every day would actually be two weekdays because at some random point in time it would switch date during the day. Let’s meet next Monday wouldn’t even specify a single day anymore in most countries. And there is no real benefit to stop using timezones, just downsides. Yes you’d know which time it is anywhere but you still wouldn’t know of they are awake or not and have to either look it up or remember it - the same you have to do now.

    • AtariDump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      We should stop using time zones…

      The way they are and divide them in half so that the western side of the current time zone gets the same-ish amount of light as the eastern side of the time zone

      … and daylight saving

      By springing ahead permanently, right? Right‽

    • Moonweedbaddegrasse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      As a British person I agree with your second point. Everyone should use Greenwich Mean Time which is obviously the correct time. Even if it means that noon is in the middle of the night for some people.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        I want the most anti-British option. I know! We’re going to do away with clocks entirely. We wake up when we wake up. We work when we work. We forget counting the days. Forget the calendar entirely. Live forever in an eternal now.

    • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      ISO dates, 100%.

      Time zones…I could see arguing to rework them, but abolish them? How would that even work?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Typically people propose switching everything to UTC.

        The read this doesn’t work is because humans are still bound by a diurnal cycle and you won’t have everyone wake up at 0800, since for some people that’s the time in the middle of when the sun sets and rises.
        So you still need to communicate to people across space where the sun is or will be for you at a time in the future, or otherwise relate where in your wake cycle you’ll be.
        Tied to this is legal jurisdictions. Within a legal jurisdiction it’s important for regulatory events to be synchronized. For things like bank hours, school hours, government office hours, things like “no loud noises when people tend to be sleeping”, “teenagers old enough to have a job aren’t allowed to work late on school nights”, and what specifically constitutes “after hours or weekend labor” for the purposes of overtime and labor regulation you need your definition to be consistent across the jurisdiction. Depending on where you are in relation to Greenwich a typical workday can start at 1900 Friday night/morning, and extend until 0300 Saturday morning/afternoon. Your “weekend” would start when you woke up around 1800 Saturday evening/morning.

        Right now we solve this problem by deciding on a consistent set of numbers for where the sun is across some area that inevitably lines up with legal jurisdiction. Then we use a lookup table to translate our conception of where the sun is to where it is elsewhere.

        Without timezones you instead need to use the same type of lookup table to find the position of the sun at the time and place of interest, and then try to infer what the situation would be.

        We have UTC now, and people inevitably already use it where it makes sense. It’s just usually easier to have many clocks that follow similar rules than it is to have one clock that’s interpreted many different ways.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      The word Data was originally a plural word

      and because of that its not “data is beautiful” it’s “data are beautiful”

    • I'm_All_NEET:3@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      “Your opinion of Monty Python is bad, and you should feel bad.”

      How? I didn’t even say it was bad just not as good as people say it is. It’s ok but it can only be random for so long. Once you’ve seen one episode you’ve seen them all. Monty Python is no different to those old asdfmovie videos.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        A set of multiple things is a plural, friend. A set of dishes, a set of clothes, a set of knives, a set of tools. THESE tools, THESE clothes, THESE knives, THESE data.

    • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Data is plural of datum, which also corresponds to the English word date. When Gregorian calender was introduced in Europe, for decades dates were the only things written in Indian style numerals.

    • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Seconded on Monty Python - he should feel terrible about that travesty.

      Also a shower per day minimum for everyone is necessary and that’s the hill I’m dying on. Clean your stinky arse up.

      • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I just shower because I like it. A more important factor in personal hygiene is if you wash your hands or not. I see so many people who piss and shit and then just run their hands under water quickly it’s fucking gross.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          You are vastly underestimating the social awkwardness that comes with telling someone they smell. Maybe you have a very different relationship than most do with their friends, but it would take quite a lot before I would bring that kind of thing up. In a professional setting, I would want to get HR involved before pointing that out to someone. I would let them figure out a polite way of asking the coworker to fix their B.O.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            At the canteen table, I brought it up once during a tangentially-related conversation and they were all very surprised. Minutes later, while the others were getting the fill, one of them even privately went up to me and confirmed.

      • I'm_All_NEET:3@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        “Seconded on Monty Python - he should feel terrible about that travesty.”

        Monty Python is for insane British “people” who think drag is the height of comedy.

        “Also a shower per day minimum for everyone is necessary and that’s the hill I’m dying on. Clean your stinky arse up.”

        Not even true. Daily showers are entirely performative. I’ll have you know there are many people in your life who don’t take showers every day and you don’t even realize.

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Sausage is meat, just ground up. People use the term “american cheese” to refer to a variety of products, ranging from almost all real cheese with a small percentage of emulsifier added, to shit like Kraft singles which is mostly milk protein concentrate and emulsifier with a small percentage of real cheese added (allegedly). The latter is usually labelled “pasteurized process cheese food/product” or something similar, US law forbids actually calling it cheese if the cheese content is less than 95% iirc

    • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      As long as the pouch on the front isn’t too constricting for my male bits and there isn’t too much material and stitching in the seam underneath, I agree. Just like anything, gotta find the right fit.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I’m a fat, unsexy dude, I bought a goofy leopard-print thong to get a laugh out of my life wife once

      It’s not my favorite pair of undies by a longshot, I still prefer my usual boxer-briefs, but it’s certainly not uncomfortable. Even wore it to my city’s naked bike ride to bike around in.

      • Justathroughdaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yeah sure dude, you totally did it cuz it was funny.

        Same here. There not my favourite but there not as bad as people make them out to be. I mostly wear them as men like them. I did a music video a few years back as a backup dancer and I woar one underneath some sweatpants. Maybe it’s because I have histrionic personality disorder but I like to look sexy. Not like a hooker or a stripper but more in a seductive way like a belly dancer or a show girl.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Small typo in my comment, was supposed to say get a laugh out of my wife

          It served its intended purpose. It was for Valentines or our anniversary or something, so I was waiting in the bed for her to come home in my leopard thong, rose petals scattered around, and some funky 70s porno music playing, and she cracked the fuck up.

          • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            I love this! That’s kinda how it started for me and now I’ve got a whole collection of them. Fun patterns and colors. They always get the laugh.

            • Fondots@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              Personally I’ve gone in on Hawaiian shirts, bit less good for a laugh, but still attention grabbing and easier to show off in public. No one wants to see my fat hairy ass sporting a whale tail.

              • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 days ago

                ¿Por qué no los dos?

                Just the same, the confidence to wear it in public is what really matters whether you still do or not. When you don’t give a shit, nothing can touch you. Total liberation. Except if there’s kids around. That just feels creepy lol.

      • Justathroughdaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Butt ones as this isn’t Australia, lol. It wasn’t until I was older myself I realized that thong had a different meaning around the world. I remember as a kid taking trips to Australia people used to always call things “thongs” and thought anything of it. As a New Zealander they’ll always be Jandals to me.

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Dampening is making things wet. Damping is reducing oscillations in something.

    Every time I hear or read people using them interchangeably is infuriating.

      • Martin@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I never understood the benefit of this. You need to go backwards at some point regardless.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          It’s safer to drive forward out of a space when you have a clear view of your surroundings, though.

          Backing out of a space when surrounded by large vehicles on either side is basically done blind, where you have to trust that people or other cars aren’t suddenly going to be right behind you.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Simple: Visibility and speed. You look at a parking spot, and if it’s empty, it’s definitely empty. It’s virtually guaranteed to stay that way as you back in, so you don’t need to monitor what’s in it. No cars, cyclists, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, et cetera, are going to enter the parking stall as you back in. That’s not true of a street or lane when you back out into it. It’s often difficult to even see traffic coming, as backup cameras don’t have the wide-angle coverage, and there’s always the possibility that you didn’t see somebody.

          As a result of both of those factors, with practice, backing in can be done in seconds, and pulling out is a breeze. Pulling in forward is a breeze, but for most people, backing out is a slower, more nerve-wracking maneuver. (At least that’s my assumption from watching how long it takes.) On the other hand, the people who just YOLO it back out into traffic are psychopaths.

  • I'm_All_NEET:3@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I forgot to mention. If you use country balls to explain something I’m not taking you seriously.

    • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I didn’t think your original points seemed controversial enough to even be hills, but this ONE! This right here… I don’t even have a clue what it is.

      • I'm_All_NEET:3@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        You can about geopolitics in a simplified and comedic way but there’s a limit. If I used sock puppets to explain the election to you wouldn’t you would think that I thought you were the stupidest person ever?

        It’s like, I’m an adult I can understand the concept of countries not liking each other without the need of simplistic cartoons. This is how you would explain geopolitics to a five-year-old.

        • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          I’m American. Speaking about geopolitics at a five-year-old’s level is often far too advanced for many people. Sock puppets might help actually.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Owning a pug is animal cruelty

    EDIT: adding bulldogs and other snub-nosed pets that wouldn’t exist without selective breeding by humans.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Even if it’s a rescue? Maybe breeding pugs (without trying to reverse the damage done to them) is pretty shitty, but I could see rescuing one is fine. I mean, what’s the other option, killing them all?

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Fair, but it still fuels the market. Somebody rescues one. Somebody else sees it and wants one but can’t find a rescue or doesn’t want a rescue, and goes to a breeder.

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          I’m pretty sure that if someone wanted a pug, seeing one person who did a rescue wouldn’t be the tipping point.

          And there are people who are trying, through breeding, to reverse the damage done to these poor animals.

          So yeah, I think there are ethical ways to own a pug.

          • venusaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Dog breeds go through trends just like anybody else. Your fav valuable has a pug? You might want a pug. Maybe not you, but that’s how trends work. The aristocracy tells you what to like. That’s the whole reason they exist in the first place.

            • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              And there’s a trend to un fuck up pugs through breeding now, but you think that’s unethical as well because that’s still owning a pug.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago
    • spelling “catsup” as “ketchup” is as juvenile as spelling “night light” as “nite lite”

    • Ohio isn’t part of the Midwest

    • all of Rory’s boyfriends in The Gilmore Girls were terrible, but Logan is the worst

    • using a slur “because it’s not a bad word in my culture” still isn’t okay

    • stephen@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      For the “Midwest”, in my opinion:

      • Ohio is in the Midwest (or at least the places you can order “pop”…maybe this isn’t a thing in Ohio…I don’t know…Ohio sucks…Go Blue)
      • North/South Dakota shouldn’t be
      • Kansas shouldn’t be
      • Nebraska shouldn’t be
      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        That’s not an opinion, you’re just wrong on the facts. And that’s okay! The first step of learning is discovering your own ignorance.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      For the first one… Not sure I get it. It was originally ketchup, and has been predominantly spelled that way for hundreds of years. It was spelled that way before ketchup even had tomato in it.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        It’s not new vs. old. Like many loanwords (hummus, shwarma) there was never one standard English spelling, but multiple phonetic transliterations.

        It’s just that one looks like an adult wrote it and one looks like a child did. It happens that Heinz, when their “57” brand became popular, used the latter spelling, and that spelling became popular along with it. Other brands used different spelling.

    • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Question about the first one. Do you consider English a living language that evolves over time?

      To that point, do you ever phonetically say boatswain instead of bosun? Which way do you spell it? How do you (personally) pronounce Worcestershire sauce? How do you feel about onomatopoeias in general?

      I would argue that words evolve with vernacular and sometimes the spellings become antiquated. In the case of Worcestershire sauce, pronunciation can vary greatly from spelling. If ketchup bothers you, are onomatopoeias even words to you?

      Eventually, insisting on the old spelling becomes more ridiculous than going with the newer. Since you spell it catsup, can you bring yourself to use a squeeze bottle for it or are you still tapping that 57 hoping to get it to ooze?

      Seriously though, since this is the hill you’ll die on, convince me otherwise about vernacular and spelling.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        a living language

        Yes

        do you ever phonetically say boatswain instead of bosun?

        I never have occasion to say either.

        How do you pronounce Worcestershire sauce?

        Wursht-uh-shur

        How do you feel about onomatopoeias in general?

        Love 'em. My current favorite is “shakshuka”.

        are onomatopoeias even words to you?

        yeah, by definition

        insisting on the old spelling becomes more ridiculous than going with the newer

        Given the choice between looking ridiculous to others and feeling ridiculous to myself, I will always choose the former.

        can you bring yourself to use a squeeze bottle for it or are you still tapping that 57

        They’re not mutually exclusive. I also use packets and those giant pump containers.

        convince me otherwise about vernacular and spelling

        I’m not interested in convincing you away from a position with which I agree almost completely. Words change, language evolves, slang becomes informal speech becomes recognized usage. Some changes are improvements, some are not, but neither you or I have much hope of shifting the tide either way. While my time lasts, though, I’ll keep spelling the vinegary condiment as “catsup” and the pastry as “doughnut” and the cultured dairy as “yoghurt”.

    • Secret Music@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I didn’t even know that “catsup” was an option until now. Where I’m from, we call it “tomato sauce” and “ketchup” is the American word as far as I’ve ever known.

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        What I consider ketchup/catsup includes much more sugar and vinegar than what I consider tomato sauce. Is that not the case where you are from or is there a different word used?

        • Secret Music@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I think that is kinda true. Like, American brands that sell here are branded as “Heinz Ketchup” for example. And it’s definitely more processed or whatever. But I feel like most people would still say “pass the tomato sauce”, or if they say ketchup it’s in a joking way. I couldn’t speak for my whole country though.

          • theparadox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            I suppose the context of condiment vs. ingredient is enough. I don’t think many recipes use ketchup/catsup and most meals don’t leave tomato sauce out to be used as a condiment.

    • Gismonda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      This seemingly simple thing enrages me on a daily basis.

      How difficult can it fucking be to write some damn code to omit “the” from sorting if it is the first word of a title? JFC

      If “the” appears first, then “ignore” must surely be a thing, right??

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      We should organize libraries not by name, or even the Dewey decimal system, but simply by title length. Fiction, non fiction, jounrla articles, doesn’t matter. It’s all just in one stupid long list, shortest title to longest title.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Agree, as a further measure It should be criminal to name stuff with “the” to begin with.

  • BenReilly97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    You should have to get a special license to drive something as big as a modern pickup truck.

    And you should have to have a justifiable reason to buy and own one.

    And there should be restrictions on where they can be driven.

    Basically most people shouldn’t have pickup trucks.

    • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Its even worse in SEA. Some countries like Nam have these small dick pick-up driving shitheads but what they don’t have is America’s huge roads and streets.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I would go further. Most cars don’t belong in places where people live. They injure and kill people on the regular, the noise pollution causes mental and physical health problems, the light pollution disrupts sleep, the particulate pollution causes cardiovascular disease and dementia, as well as damaging ecosystems, driving adds to obesity and issues related to a sedentary lifestyle, the physical space they take leads to sprawl and ecosystem destruction, and the sprawl also bankrupts cities and towns. As well, driving in traffic just plain sucks as an activity, and makes people angry and miserable.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Oh yeah. Cars are bad on like every metric.

        Socially they isolate people. You don’t interact with anyone when you’re driving except to get angry. The micro interactions you have on the train matter. Seeing people that aren’t just like you, also annoyed that the train is delayed, or just having a nice time with their kids, matters. More than makes up for when other people are annoying.

        Economically they hurt. It’s much harder to just pop into an interesting looking shop when you’re cruising along at 40mph. All the space dedicated to parking could be used for other stuff- housing, commerce, communal space, whatever.

        They make spaces less safe. Other than the direct impact (no pun intended) of people getting hit by cars, or crashing into stuff, a space that has steady foot traffic is generally safer. If everyone was in their car instead, you’d probably be alone on foot with no one to help if something happened.

        They’re bad for the environment. Air pollution, micro plastics, whatever.

        Drunk driving is way more dangerous than drunk “riding the train”.

        The more non-car options are built out, the better it will be for people who need to drive for whatever reason.

        Cars culture is trash and if we ever escape from it, it’s going to take years.

        • NKBTN@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Going to disagree with your second point. In the UK at least, there’s a lot of friendly “no, after you” type activity. If the road narrows due to an overhead railway bridge or parked cars etc. generally speaking one or both will pull over, flash their lights to signal the other one can go first, and get a friendly wave of thanks when they pass. Letting people in at junctions isn’t uncommon either, though tends to be more the exception than the rule.

          There is anger too of course, but usually only aimed at people who aren’t following the rules of the road, have done something stupid/dangerous, or are hesitating for far too long.

      • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I‘d love to move to India again. I just don’t know how I could get a job there. I don’t have any fancy degrees.

    • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Id love a pickup…but it would be impractical, expensive to buy and run, the back space is basically useless cause even if you do put a cover on, the locks are crap. So I won’t be getting a pick up truck. Plus, where I live, it would go missing.

    • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      The only reason Americans started buying pick up trucks on mass is because of Tarifs put on Japanese car manufacturers in the 1970s and pick up trucks had no taxes on them suddenly became one of the cheapest and more affordable cars in the United States. Rick Wolf explained this somewhere I can’t remember where exactly.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        There were also reduced fuel economy requirements for trucks and off-road vehicles, which contributed to the rise of SUVs.

      • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Love how the bed of the truck is basically the same size (if not smaller) as well so really you can’t use the excuse of needing the bigger truck for hauling stuff.

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    -Businesses should be run by people who are passionate about the giving a great product and/or service and not some shitty MBA who only except 10x return on his investment.