Ah, good idea putting the fire in the tent, that way the fire will stay warm
No, that’s fine. It’s the 👍 thumb! Look at it! It’s freakishly small but not ridiculously small.
Or the single Wolverine stick claw.
that’s just a sardine, I think
The hot air is also guaranteed to keep the tent up.
It also stores a lot of heat in the walls of the tent, which will keep the air inside from cooling down too much over the course of the night.
If you put the whole ass campfire in the tent, it might fly away. Put the fire in the freezer overnight, then thaw it out in chunks when needed.
Alternatively, scrape some glue off your pizza and use it to stick the tent’s bottom to the ground.
Great advice. I’ve sometimes woken up several fields over after the fire has been a bit ferocious. The screams of my family as we’ve flown over people’s houses has also caused some complaints.
I always pack several tablets of dehydrated water with me so if I’m running out, I can just dissolve a couple to have something to drink or cook with
I did not notice that, all I did was look at the image on autopilot
Nice asbestos tent, but she still got Gollum fingers doe.
Fuck I was totally convinced until I saw her shoe laces
And that could be one if the “totally lifehack” ways of tieing your shoes that never make any sense.
what about the metal rod extending from her right hand?
Nah that’s normal, obviously
That’s a genetic condition, racist
Just a shitty version of Wolverine
She has the same skeletal structure as Wolverine it seems.
Achtually Wolverine can’t bend his wrists
There’s still something uncanny about it.
Still incredibly impressive. I wouldn’t believe this was prompt generated just a few years ago.
Which bit is uncanny to you?
The thing that got me was the lighting. I’ve been camping and you just can’t get a good photo of your tent fire. Not as well lit as this at least.
I don’t trust people with fire-proof tents.
The lighting doesn’t feel very natural. It’s inconsistent.
Her hair and face suggest a direct sunlight from the left, but the environment suggests indirect sunlight. The background trees should have more direct sunlight to the left.
The tentfire should also spill out some light to the environment.
The tent also suggests the sunlight comes from the right.
Consistent lighting is something AI is currently struggling with. It gives off a Photoshop edit vibe.
So the fire inside the tent would not give it away a few years back?
I would think it was a weird photoshop job.
Is this the female Voulverine?
That’s the tell. Wolverine’s daughter is a brunette.
The magical half hair, half rock.
A smart move would have been to put a real photo here and then troll all the comments about uncanny valley …and by smart I mean troll.
…
I will totally do that in future.
( btw. the hands are still messy ☝️)
It would be neat to have a community where images are posted and people discuss whether they are authentic photos or AI generated.
Did you miss the fire in the tent too?
I’ve seen enough posts on Instagram to not be surprised by idiots ruining a perfectly good tent just for a shot 🤷♂️
How about the stick that is glued on top of her hand?
That’s part of the “messy hands”
I think it’d be pretty tricky to get a fire going at that size and get the photo taken before the thin plastic of the tent melted or burst into flames. The tent in the picture is fine, which I honestly think would be impossible with that setup, even if you tried to be quick
her fingers are still funky but not terrible!
I’ve seen live people actually starting a bonfire in their living room something like 20 years ago, so to me this is perfectly possible :D
Even with foreshortening, those are some freakishly short legs.
The tells
Hands issues, thumb and metal claw
Face issue, studio lighting on face, right eye is not eyeing.
Body issues, left leg is a weird tiny leg
Boot laces lack credibility
Fire in a tent
AI is bad at the details.
Prespective is not done properly. Trying to spoof 3D with a 2D model.
I’ve gotten so used to looking at the details that I didn’t even notice the blatant fire-in-the-tent.
I was staring at the hands and thinking it wasn’t too bad.
They’re terrible!
I actually kind of love that AI art can’t even pretend to do hands right. But also I had an instructor who’s catch phrase was ‘‘if you let the computer do it, it’s gonna suck’’ so. Not really a surprise AI can only defeat art that’s placid and uninspired shit. and can’t even do anything on model or sequential… it’s just… it can be a placeholder and that’s about it.
This reminds me of camping in my youth with my alcoholic uncle.
You better not be gearing up to go all Deliverance on us with that story
Deliverance didn’t have drunk uncles.
I mean, that’s just a minor detail. And Deliverance taught me how to prepare for south of Market clubs in my 20s. IYKYK.
Your uncle is hot
I think more that the fire is hot cuz he made it in a tent
The eyes look demonic
It’s funny how the generators arent getting better. They’ve plateaued pretty hard in terms of believability. Glance value? Convincing.
Under any level of scrutiny though this falls apart in at least a dozen ways.
“AI” image generation actually takes a lot of human knowledge and understanding of the models to manipulate outcomes. It is a different kind of effort, but the issues with it are based in human use of the tool.
Prompt engineering isn’t a real field bro
It’s more the free and public versions have plateaued
Gpt 4 premium pictures still have these major issues.
I think the scale of image believability is logarithmic. Going from “believable at a glance” to “believable under scrutiny” requires an exponential increase in performance compared with going from “not believable at a glance” to “believable at a glance”. The same principle applies to text generation, facial recognition, sound generation, image enhancement, etc. One of the many reasons AI should not be being integrated in many of the ways world governments and corporations are trying to integrate it.
It’s unclear if the current models can reach that level though. They seem more like they’re asymtotically approaching their limit.
Maybe I’m wrong and GPT 5 will be the end all and be all - but I don’t think generalist models will ever be consistent enough. Specialist generators focused on specifics, trained to output very defined data seem more likely to be useful than this attempt to make a single catch all LLM.
