• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yeah, that’s what sources are for, vetting information. If your source is unreliable then you get called out for it.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m not going to sit here and “read more theory” that you keep pulling out

      That’s not “calling out unreliable sources”, that’s saying “any source you provide I’m not going to read”.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        when you can’t even say in your own words why Mamdani needs permission from Albany or the governor.

        Whats the matter, you hit your word limit and couldn’t finish quoting?

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I’ll remind you we are currently in the thread where someone was “saying in their own words” and that wasn’t good enough for you either.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yeah, they couldn’t say why, provide any evidence of their claim and neither could their articles, but I’m supposed to accept the claim as fact? I’m just supposed to sit down and read 6 articles which would print to like 80 pages and then accept their unsubstantial claims as fact for no reason but the sheer number of words placed in front of me? That’s really dumb, anon.