• HailSeitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    nobody is forcing devs to release on Steam

    Right, just like “nobody” is forcing retailers to sell on Amazon. Everyone is “free” to not sell on the single largest marketplace for their product which is also the first (and usually only) place the vast majority of potential customers will look for that kind of product. Get out of here with this “zero lockin” nonsense.

    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Still, he’s right. Other publishers have tried and failed to bring a competitor to steam, and it’s not because valve doesn’t allow it (like Apple) but because steam is simply superior in terms of features and usability.
      Even epic with massive investment in their store hasn’t caught up to half of what makes steam great for gaming.
      I’m pretty certain if someone makes a real competitor to steam, it could dethrone it eventually. Epic isn’t hated because it’s not steam, but because they tried to buy their market share through anti competitive clauses.

      Granted, it’s harder by the year because steam has a huge head start, and users may be unwilling to switch now after spending a lot on the platform. Maybe some form of forced legal interoperability would help foster competition

      • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Valve’s lockin is your Steam library not being portable. A better comparison is switching from iOS to Android, or better yet Xbox to PlayStation, and having to leave behind any apps or games you purchased on one platform.

        I agree that interop would be the best solution. For a brief period, GOG had a program that granted free licenses for games you already owned on Steam, verified by linking accounts. That is what has to be available for the entirety of everyone’s libraries, prospectively even if not retroactively, for there to even begin to be a level playing field.

        • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah it’s a lock in but like you show, it’s the same everywhere.
          I don’t know a way we could really have interoperability between stores without major financial agreement between them, because hosting the platform and services has a cost that is paid by the cut, if you move your games elsewhere they have to provide the bandwidth for you to download your games “for free”