This actually did happen and that’s probably what the green text is based off of.
I remember reading the article a few years ago, linked off of Reddit iirc, so if someone wants to go wade in those waters again you’ll probably find it
Now that you mention it, it does sound familiar. I’m not sure if it’s a constructed memory on my part though.
Given that people have done things like spash acid on their former partners’ faces and say things like “if I can’t have you then no one can” then I’m not terribly surprised that someone might try something like this.
But you’re right, in general I don’t trust green texts as truth. This could easily just be someone summarizing a story that happened as a green text though (which is a common thing).
I’d link the tweet where he said that it’s “impossible to find child pornography here anymore” as a way to pretend that Musk fixed Twitter, but I couldn’t find it and now my search algorithm is probably fucked after trying several different queries with the words “Jordan Peterson child porn” in them 🤦😂
I mean, hopefully you also have not tried because before finding things, you might find hints to find things. What i am trying to say is, there are many bad things that you will only find once you seek it out, but once you do it is not hard (enough).
It’s fucked up that anyone can do this and ruin a person’s life
Luckily green text is fiction, no one really did this.
This actually did happen and that’s probably what the green text is based off of.
I remember reading the article a few years ago, linked off of Reddit iirc, so if someone wants to go wade in those waters again you’ll probably find it
Now that you mention it, it does sound familiar. I’m not sure if it’s a constructed memory on my part though.
Given that people have done things like spash acid on their former partners’ faces and say things like “if I can’t have you then no one can” then I’m not terribly surprised that someone might try something like this.
But you’re right, in general I don’t trust green texts as truth. This could easily just be someone summarizing a story that happened as a green text though (which is a common thing).
Can’t download things on your laptop if you don’t give them your laptop
Can’t victim blame if there’s no victim to blame.
Offering advice to prevent such a situation isn’t victim blaming
Advice after the fact is a useless lecture, a form of victim blaming.
Saying “if you hadn’t done x, crime y wouldn’t have happened” to the victim of a crime is the very definition of victim blaming.
OOP isn’t in this thread. I don’t think the user you’re chastising intended to give OOP advice, the advice was for the rest of us.
Still textbook victim blaming rather than the benevolent “advice” you seem adamant to reframe it as.
Sure, champ. Everything is victim blaming.
Nope. But “you wouldn’t have been a victim if not for trusting your apparent friend” very much is.
People trust their friends with their laptops without being victimized every fucking day.
Even scarier that malware can do this and use your device as a distribution node
I mean I can’t. I have no idea where to begin to look for stuff like that.
You could ask Jordan Peterson
I’d link the tweet where he said that it’s “impossible to find child pornography here anymore” as a way to pretend that Musk fixed Twitter, but I couldn’t find it and now my search algorithm is probably fucked after trying several different queries with the words “Jordan Peterson child porn” in them 🤦😂
If the police are there right now, nod twice.
I mean, hopefully you also have not tried because before finding things, you might find hints to find things. What i am trying to say is, there are many bad things that you will only find once you seek it out, but once you do it is not hard (enough).
Becouse obviously the police will not question anything in such a circumstance.
If you read the post it says the cop didn’t buy it and anon got charged themselves instead.
Not really no.
It will be decided by a court case.