I mean the tutorial can be seen as the most important part of the game cause if it socks nobody is gonna play the rest
Hence, they brought in Patrick Stewart.
It’s also ostensibly the root of the main plot, hence his character should leave an impression.
Oblivion’s start was so much more memorable than Skyrim’s. Getting taught the basics by escaping prison and then immediately being served the full open world after that was magnificent.
The best start is in Morrowind, where you’re released from prison and fill out paperwork!
Followed by “Go to Balmora and visit someone. Balmora is north of us.”
That’s one of the best things about Morrowind vs. the later games (and I’m not even joking this time). It makes you explore the world, not just warp to quest objectives. It has fast travel, but it makes you earn it and think about how to use it effectively.
The lack of quest markers create the most memorable adventures and the most frustrating adventures.
Stumbling upon ruins and caves while you stumbling around trying to find where you are suppose to go.
Frustrating as sometimes those directions were so vague…also you always find yourself in an area of cliff racers.
…also you always find yourself in an area of cliff racers.
Speaking of which, having the honor of meeting Jiub (pre-sainthood) is the real reason Morrowind’s start is the best. 😍
Instantly ruined by the ability to teleport to the main city
To ANY city.
Fortunately, I discovered that an hour or two in, so I still got some free roam in!
I played Oblivion for 10+ hours. Game was fantastic, I was hooked. I complained to my friend who had recommended me the game about how much walking there was. He explained fast travel.
To this day it’s still a running joke: “You can fast travel?!?”
As opposed to Skyrim where you learn the basics by escaping a fucking dragon, guards(because you’re a prisoner), and a creature as well(I think it’s a bear?). And then immediately served the full open world.
Buddy, like what you like and all but Skyrim’s tutorial sequence is at least the same and arguably better.
I definitely see your point, and I had to think about why I found the Skyrim tutorial so much less memorable. And I think, to me, it’s that it’s the tutorial, so you just know that the dragon isn’t going to kill you. Similarly, you know that the prison guards and assassins in Oblivion won’t kill you, but you don’t know that about the emperor. And unlike the dudes that ride with you on the carriage during the opening scene of Skyrim, I’ve got at least the faintest connection to Oblivion’s emperor dude. Like, I really couldn’t have cared less when it was said that Ulfrik, the rebel leader, was on the carriage, too. I don’t know anything about the rebellion, so if the guy would’ve been executed right then and there, I just couldn’t have cared.
You put to words how I felt about it. I couldn’t have given less a shit about these people, I don’t know them nor their troubles and dilemmas about their country.
“Choose who you’re gonna side with!” brother I know nothing about either of your organizations, me going with you isn’t me siding with your whole organization, I just want to get the fuck out of here.
Skyrim makes an attempt to keep you on the main quest, sending you to that little town/tavern in the valley, trying to push you to Whiterun and some intro sidequests.
Oblivion just dumps you out of the sewer pipe with Kvatch being a faint background thought, smack dab in the center of the open map.
And then Morrowind actually tells you to stop doing the mainquest and sandbox for a while.
A game containing the voice of Patrick Stewart AND a mod with contributions from the legendary Terry Pratchett.
Now, play Starfield and try to wrap your head around the fact that both of these titles were made by the same company.
Starefield
It’s been decades between them. I choose to believe none of the devs and designers (and the synergy they had) that made the games I love still work there.
This brought to mind the Mr. Plinkett TNG mistakes video. Many times the mark on the floor indicating where the actors should stand is visible in the HD remasters, and at one point he said something along the lines of “Patrick Stewart’s a consummate professional, always hits his mark.”
This is great! Thank you for sharing it
It was amazing to me how I never noticed a single one of these when watching them in SD back in the day. They did great work for shooting on such a tight schedule!
I’ve now watched in HD like a hundred times, and I’ve still never noticed most of these. Random shapes in the background on a set full of doodads and gadgets? Give me a break. Those hands with the flute, though, I’ll never unsee, lol.
If you think that’s impressive, Jeremy Brett did that on his own!
Brett was approached in February 1982 by Granada Television to play Holmes. The idea was to make a totally authentic and faithful adaptation of the character’s best cases. Eventually Brett accepted the role; he wanted to be the best Sherlock Holmes the world had ever seen.[37] He conducted extensive research on the great detective and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle himself, and was very attentive to discrepancies between the scripts he had been given and Conan Doyle’s original stories.[38] One of Brett’s dearest possessions on the set was his 77-page “Baker Street File” on everything from Holmes’ mannerisms to his eating and drinking habits. Brett once explained that “some actors are becomers—they try to become their characters. When it works, the actor is like a sponge, squeezing himself dry to remove his own personality, then absorbing the character’s like a liquid”.[39] Brett was focused on bringing more passion to the role of Holmes. He introduced Holmes’s rather eccentric hand gestures and short violent laughter. He would hurl himself on the ground just to look for a footprint, “he would leap over the furniture or jump onto the parapet of a bridge with no regard for his personal safety.”[40]
Yes, Jeremy Brett was the best Holmes ever, his personal issues and depression augmented the role and he sunk so deeply into it that he sometimes referred to Sherlock the character as a real person.
Other portrayals shows healthy detectives full of vitality and charm but Jeremy Brett understood the brilliant but self abusive sometimes obsessive character with many layers to his complicted personality.
Not saying that it’s better necessarily, but for fans of that adaptation, taking a look at the soviet rendition might be well worth your while
They went to the trouble and presumably significant expense to hire Patrick Stewart to play a character who doesn’t live past the tutorial?
Yup. But by the gods, does it set the tone.
Let me see your face… You are the one from my dreams… Then the stars were right, and this is the day. Gods give me strength!
Stole this from somewhere
I don’t get it. Is 90 pages supposed to be a lot of text for a professional actor?
90 pages of backstory? Entirely aside from the actual script containing the dialogue he has to read?
I don’t know whether that’s a lot—not having conversed with any professional actors—but I strongly suspect the answer is yes.
