• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Damn, Brother was the only company left I was happy to blind purchase from by name alone.

    • nyandere@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Brother’s been anti-consumer for at least 5 years now. Not sure why people are just learning about it now.

      Brother blocking 3rd party toner was the primary reason why I went with Canon back in 2020.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not saying they couldn’t/shouldn’t but printers are a nightmare hellscape and it’s a miracle, mostly of HP’s marketing department, that they’re a household object.

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Back before everyone had maps on their phone, printing MapQuest maps was fantastic. This was the early 00’s though and we all had money to burn still.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You actually can’t sell third-party printers legally, because all printers will include an ink fingerprint which can be traced back to that specific printer. So if someone prints a ransom note, the FBI will be knocking on their door by the end of the day.

      There’s literally a certification process to be allowed to sell printers, and one of the biggest criteria for that certification is agreeing to maintain that fingerprint database. The issue is that this certification process also ensures there’s a de facto near monopoly on printers, which leads to BS like HP making it increasingly difficult to use affordable ink. They can be blatantly anti-consumer, because they’re protected from any competition.

      There’s a reason HP hasn’t already been priced out by some cheap Chinese competitor who is able to undercut the competition. And it’s not because of the difficulty in manufacturing or the price of components. It’s because no other companies are allowed to sell printers.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        You make it sound like a huge conspiracy but there are laws and regulations around everything you try to sell, especially for electronics.

        You also have to do EMF radiation testing, ensure that your printer doesn’t produce toxic aerosols or fumes, and probably a bunch of other things to prove that your product is safe. I don’t see why the fingerprinting isn’t just another thing on the list of things you have to do to be in compliance with the rules. If your company is capable of producing something as complex as a printer, encoding the device’ serial number into a bunch of yellow microdots that you add to the printout shouldn’t be an issue.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          ensure that your printer doesn’t produce toxic aerosols or fumes

          But they do? I literally got sick after i spent a day in a small room with a big office printer. And each printer makes my skin itchy, if printing in close proximity.

          • jdeath@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            yeah let’s build “ghost printers” wait are we in a cyberpunk dystopia?!

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            AR15 lower receiver model. You can buy a kit that’s 85% of the way to done and only needs basic tools from there.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You actually can’t sell third-party printers legally, because all printers will include an ink fingerprint which can be traced back to that specific printer.

        All color printers.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        May I have the legal text, of any country, requiring a certification to sell any printers, or have EURion contellation dection implemented, or legally required to implement tracking dots?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We have great examples of things sold as parts or kits to be assembled

        Take handguns as an example. If a murder weapon can be assembled from parts with only the frame 3d printed, and avoid similar laws for traceability, surely a printer is an easier task

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s funny how far ahead 3d printers are in terms of consumer experience, everything is open, everything works and the tech is like 300 times more complex.

    2D printer companies should be shamed to death.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Over time as 3D printers go from tinkerer’s toy to household staple, I’d expect them to become more locked down and anti-consumer.

      • CandleTiger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bambu is working on it already — can’t print unless you’re connected to the internet and send your files through their server, can’t connect to the printer with other slicers besides their slicer.

        They had to walk that back some; there is now a “developer mode” where old standard functionality is still exposed, but they’re clearly working as hard as they can to turn it shitty.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Makerbot after the Stratasys buyout.

          There were a bunch of companies that tried right after the FDM patents expired in 2009. Most of them were completely forgotten or ignored because they were closed source (and more importantly closed material) companies and never got very far off the starting blocks.

          Bamboo learned from them and decided to pull the rug out after getting a foothold with finally selling decent prebuilt hardware for less than a fortune (see Ultimaker before buying out MakerBot at least).

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They would have to become sci-fi level capable before they would be considered household staple items.

    • paf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is mainly because consumer 3d printer have been developped by 3d printing enthusiast first and not a company, Prusa which was leader for some time used a lot of open sources project to build their printers. As it’s getting mainstream as time goes by more and more companies shows up with closed sources project sadly.

        • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Aren’t you confusing them with Bambu?

          Their slicer is based on Prusa’s exactly because Prusa isn’t doing closed source.

          • paf@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            One of the latest Prusa printer is closed source If I remember correctly Core xy

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      2D printers used to be like this.
      They all worked with open, universal drivers, no additional software, and any ink cartridge that fit inside the bay.
      But then companies figured out that people will just buy the cheapest printer on offer, regardless of everything else.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They’re actually behind. 3D printers are a much newer industry. Most industries start out super open, competitive and collaborative. This speeds up development to consumer-grade products. Eventually one or two companies gain sufficient marketshare to start enforcing anti-consumer shitfuckery. Look at the recent drama with Bambu printers and you’ll find that’s exactly what’s happening. It’s a tale as old as time.

      Framework actually trolled us into thinking they were going to release a printer but instead they went into a market segment where everything was already modular, repairable and upgradable and gave us something that was not, at all. But hey, they gotta capitalize on the AI nonsense too, I guess?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is a piece of software which will take a word document and convert it into an embossed 3D print file. So you could always just skip the middleman and 3D print yourself a plaque version of your document instead.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Now i had to put on the in-ears, hook up to phone to… listen to a guy talking. -_-

    Short summary: the MFC 3750 of Louis Rossman prints in worse quality with aftermarket ink, after he got a firmware update.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I no longer have any corporate relationships that aren’t either apprehensive, strained, or downright antagonistic.

    It’s us versus them now and they’ve give their last shits. It’s feeling like every company is a cable company now.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Always has been like that.

      Not one single corporation is your friend or wants to be. All they want is your money. No exceptions.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Companies were never our friends, but it used to be the case that companies sold products. They sold a product and you got to use it and that was the end of it.

        Now instead, thanks largely to the Internet, companies barely care about ‘product’ at all and instead are all trying to get in on that gravy train of monetised data slurping, subscription models, DRM on every consumable, firmware updates that change the terms on you after the fact, and so on. Every electronic thing in your home is now super hostile to you.

        TVs, printers, fridges. These products used to be just products, but now they are trojan horses.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          This shift in business model also means a drop in customer service. They used to sell you a product and stand behind it because eventually they wanted you to choose them when you needed a new or different product. Now that they have you roped in via a sort of forced dependency, they don’t have to pretend to be nice to you even.

          • tiramichu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Exactly. The way to make money pre-Internet was “generate repeat business” and the way to do that was to create a product and service the customer was happy with.

            The way to make money now is to get the customer trapped, then pump them as hard as possible.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have VERY few and I cherish them.

      Fairphone feels great to me. I think My coffee stuff is the same (Profitec, Eureka Mignon); no app or wifi or anything, fairly available spare parts.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I rarely use a printer now that my kids are in college. When it dies, I had a choice between laser printer, Brother inkjet, or none. “None” is now my first choice

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what we did.

      For the few pages we need to print, I can use the machine at the library for $0.10/page.

      • comfydecal@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So issue here is privacy, the library is likely scanning whatever device connected, not just the files and file metadata

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I trust the library a lot more than I trust Staples or a similar for-profit business.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Seriously? The library computers are running Windows 8 I highly doubt they have the technical expertise to do anything. Also why would they?

          • comfydecal@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, with the Vault 7 releases and recent leaks showing NSA follows homeless people’s connections (who tend to hang out at libraries due to a lack of 3rd spaces), I don’t doubt there’s specific tracking, malware and other unwanted software at libraries. I don’t have any sources of this, but it wouldn’t surprise me

            Maybe I’m overly parandoid because ::gestures at everything::

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Okay, so after reading this, they’re not specifically degrading print quality, they’re just making you do the alignment manually. This is probably legal, but still scummy.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Future for normies: Renting/subscribing for everything

            Future for me: Rejecting everything, I will write in cuneiform on clay tablets before I subscribe for a fucking HP printer.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly, more people should probably do that. If you have a low printing volume, you’ll save a lot of money by going to a store to get prints.

        Yes, you can argue that you need the convenience of having a printer right there. Just realize you’re spending a lot of extra money for that convenience.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    O, damnit. Not the last bastion of hope!

    Edit: 100% serious. Like Rossmann, Brother was the go-to brand.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The last bid I reviewed for a new office recommended Brother printers (woot) but the color laser had toner lock-in. I recommended an alternative and the owner agreed.

    Too bad these companies won’t know about the products they don’t sell because of this crap.