Summary

Elon Musk’s DOGE faces mounting pressure to show achievements amid criticism. Staffers, under pressure from Trump administration officials, seek public relations wins to counter negative headlines.

Cuts to federal offices led to mass layoffs, and efforts to modernize government services have been chaotic. DOGE prioritizes speed over security and protecting sensitive information.

Trump has distanced himself, stating agency chiefs, not Musk, control department cuts, preferring a “scalpel” over a “hatchet” approach. Public opinion has turned against DOGE, with 48% disapproving versus 34% approving, according to a Washington Post-Ipsos poll.

With limited time before their tenure ends, DOGE officials are desperate to show results.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What’s all the BS they’ve been doing all this time? Is it not winning to crash about like a bull in a china shop wrecking things? What sort of “win” are they looking for? Are they looking for a Death Star shot where the entire country says, “as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.”

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      These idiots are so drunk on their own Kool aid that everyone in government is useless and corrupt and not actually working and that it’s all a “waste.”

      Also that zillions of people are on government support that should not be, nevermind that its people, exactly like Musk, who have run their shitty corpos in such a way that people can’t afford to exist anymore without government assistance.

      I mean, technically he is right, there are a ton of people who should not be on government programs, that are, because profit profit profit companies have made life miserable and those people don’t have a choice.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ooh traditional American victories included overthrowing a regime in a third world country, there’s one he doesn’t even have to do much to do.

  • Seleni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    48% disapproving.

    He’s destroying our entire government and 52% of Americans think ‘yeah, this is fine’ or ‘yeah, who cares?’

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They don’t understand what the people being fired do. There’s no marketing or awareness campaigns for the GSA clerks that keep every government office in the country stocked with chairs; or the mental health nurses that pick up the phone at 2 in the morning.

      People think it’s some white guy just golfing while they collect checks.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is a common misconception. The military isn’t designed to be efficient on the back end. It’s designed to win wars efficiently, which is an entirely different thing. The last time they tried to be “efficient” with the military the 101st ended up doing the world’s fastest ground and air assault on rations because they didn’t have enough food and water. And entire battalions got extremely sick from using local water when they absolutely had to.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That’s how we know it was never about auditing or waste.

      We have generals from the military asking for less equipment , and then congress ignores them and rubber stamps the contracts of their doners in the Military Industrial Complex.

      https://apnews.com/united-states-government-united-states-congress-4416606e329b4c8baa755aad333d73db

      If we want to go after real waste in our spending we need to start forcing the rich to make concessions. This becomes more true every year we allow wealth inequality to continue growing.

  • makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    With limited time before their tenure ends, DOGE officials are desperate to show results.

    Uh first I’m hearing of this

  • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The funny thing is that Elon Musk is the wealthiest man ever and enough hecklers chanting “no one likes Elon” in a sing song manner would bring him to tears

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d say it’s predictable … Had it been a success I think Trump would be shouting “One of my master moves, this is the mother of all my moves” Now we get to read “Trump has distanced himself” meaning it’s failing and Musk is gonna be sacrificed without a thought “I don’t know what Musk did, he acted like a loose cannon but I fired him for his incompetence”

      • MrVilliam@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        True, but what does musk have left to give to trump? If he’s no longer useful, trump will have no problem dumping him and moving on. As soon as he thinks it’s more beneficial to turn on musk than it is to suck his dick, he will. Loyalty is one way for him.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think its a game of “who owns the zeitgeist?” Its why “Rumble” exists; why fascists sought their own media ecosystems; its why Elon bought twitter.

          There is some threshold where another billion buys you no more power, or at least, significantly less than your last billion. Hence buying a the worlds largest microphone, twitter, for what seemed like an overpriced market value.

          So if Elon controls Trumps access; or even more threateningly, if Elon captures the zeitgeist, and Trump is no longer in control of narratives, or Elon is able to create and inject his own, thats a real material threat.

          Trump is going to die soon; whoever inherits this cult is the real threat.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Elon has said he will spend the money to drive out any Republican that votes against Trump. Elon controls Congress.

  • Billybob22@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes where are the weapons of mass corruption?

    Maybe Saddam Husein can help?

    Oh no they hung him!

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wouldn’t call it “efficient” but I would call it optimal given the complexity.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think it certainly can, since humans are involved, and humans are messy.

          A lot of government stuff should be automated in software, but that takes an immense amount of time to develop. Like… why are taxes so hard when the IRS always has all my data?

          Efficient? Not as much as it should be. But good luck wrangling that many people’s needs at once.

          • fake_meows@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Like… why are taxes so hard when the IRS always has all my data?

            In some European countries, the government automatically does the taxes and just sends a letter showing the result of the calculation so you have a chance to review the result.

            They have all the numbers already…

          • TylerBourbon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Taxes are so hard because Tax Return Companies spend a lot of money to lobby the government to make it harder. The IRS could do it all in-house for “free” but there’s too much money in making us go through 3rd parties to file our taxes. Private business always finds a way to add more inefficiency to processes to make us pay more so they can nickel and dime us. “Want that efficient service? Well, you got to pay more.” It’s a scam.

            There is a lot of stuff, sure, that could be automated in software, but that’s mostly admin work, like processing invoices and things like that. But then, no one ever wants to spend money on things. For instance, I work for a state DOT. It’s a battle to get the state legislature to properly fund maintenance. They’d rather spend their money on new shiny things they can show off to get elected.

            The real inefficiency in government is almost always directly related to the elected official’s decisions. Take graffiti, they don’t want to spend money, and we don’t have the budget to keep up with graffiti and provide road maintenance. But then a big sports event or famous band comes to town for a huge event, and next thing you know graffiti is our number one priority.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Every time there’s a World War, a bunch of industries are put under the control of the government in a process called Nationalization, or a “War Economy”…

      …this is because it’s highly efficient. This is an excellent argument against free market libertarian types. They don’t put business in charge of government (like is being done now, eg. Privatization) they put the government in charge of business/industry.

      • rigatti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My societal dream is that the government would nationalize industries once they reach the monopoly or oligopoly stage. Like, congratulations Comcast/Verizon, you won the game of capitalism. Now move over and let the government actually provide services to the people at a reasonable cost.

        But I know this is just a dream.

        • oppy1984@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Honestly I’d prefer that the government set up government corporations to provide basic needs. The private corporations could still operate but they would control the higher end market. The gov. corps. would just make sure basics were affordable, not high quality.

          Need a car? The gov corp car is $15,000 brand new and is basic as hell, but it gets the job done.

          Need Internet? The gov corp fiber network is mid range speed and connects to everyone. As a bonus for profit corps and but rights to the dumb pipe fiber network that the gov corp set up and off higher speed at a higher price.

          Basic clothes, basic toiletries, basic food, etc. you want designer or high end stuff, get it from the for profit corps. But basic necessities should be made at cost by the government for the citizens. It is the job of the government to care for it’s citizens after all.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean, the poison is already in your pitch - “private sector gets the high end”. What happens when the government fiber turns out to be faster? What happens when the government cheese is actually better? What happens when the government clothes turn out to be higher quality than the shit we wear today?

            What is Verizon going to do? Cry to Congress that they need to go out of their way and pay more to artificially slow down gov fiber. Kellogg will cry free healthy food is ruining demand for overprocessed corn syrup products. If they don’t kill it in the cradle they’re all going to chip away at it, one bit at a time

            How about the government produces the basics and the infrastructure, and corporations get fucked? Let small local business take over, and use the infrastructure at cost. Let competition thrive, and we use antitrust like the pro-active protection against oligarchy it was meant to be

            • oppy1984@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I get what you’re saying, but government fiber speeds could be capped, products wouldn’t be high end, ect.

              I am by no means an economist, or an expert in these matters, and I apologize if I was presenting as those I was. I just feel like you should put those kind of ideas out there for others to iterate on.

              • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                There is no point in capping fiber speeds. Either that capacity is in use or it isn’t. It isn’t like water, where a resource is depleted from usage.

                Aside from that, I agree with your concept of the government providing all the essentials. Capitalism is great for providing products that suit a person’s individuality, but it sucks at ensuring the survival and wellbeing of people.

  • Roguelazer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Part of me wonders whether the whole thing is just a set up so Trump can look good for shutting them down…

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, that would require planning and forethought.

      DOGE was always just an excuse to fire a bunch of government workers, cancel contracts (except for Musk), and run the government into the ground. If trump did fire Musk for overreach it would be afger the damage is done and trump will just proclaim mission accomplished.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re giving too much forethought for a plan, but Trump thinks that way about everyone. He’s not just a bully but a toxic boss who always has someone lined up to be the fall guy.

      The goal was always to fire a bunch of workers and replace them with sycophants: people actually trying to do their job inhibited the damage in trumps first term, so nope the priority is sycophants. Sycophants. everywhere. But every action needs a fall guy