• DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    *lemmings

    Probably people who yell at cyclists for following traffic laws, bonus points for them also violating said laws without repercussion.

  • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fundamental attribution error. Wanting something to happen ≠ believing it should happen. When wanting becomes believing, you are fucked.

    Too many people think that the world should bend the laws of reality to conform to their ideas. Gamblers are the prime example. They take something solvable by pure math and completely discard the solution, opting for a solution based on their wants instead of reality.

  • ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hours spent working is not the same as productivity.

    Twice as many people assigned to a project does not double productivity either.

    I could go on…

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Perpetual growth in a finite system is impossible, and anything that relies on perpetual growth to function is doomed to eventually fail.

    For instance: social services that rely on perpetual population growth (especially youth population; e.g. Japan/South Korea), companies that rely on perpetual increase in users (most publicly-owned companies; e g. basically every social media company ATM), industries that rely on perpetual advancements in technology (e.g. industrialized agriculture, which constantly needs new ways to fight self-induced problems like soil depletion and erosion), housing as wealth generation (to be a wealth generator it has to outpace inflation, but at a certain point no one will be able to afford to purchase houses at their inflated prices no matter how over-leveraged they get; e.g. Canada). [Note that these are merely examples where these issues are currently coming to a head; they are by no means special cases, they’re just in a more advanced state of “finding out.”]

    In other words, a lot of the modern world, in both public and private sectors, is built around a series of ponzi schemes.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      But you’re assuming the type of growth will never change.

      • population growth is not sustainable and we’re past that point, but knowledge growth is
      • resources growth is not sustainable and we’re past that point for many resources, but economies can grow independently of resources
      • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They literally said:

        Perpetual growth in a finite system is impossible

        I don’t see how your comment applies to that.

        Knowlegde growth may be sustainable, but it is also impossible to grow forever. (Supposing knowlegde is finite, which is, as far as I see it, the case as long as we make the definition of knowledge depend on characteristics like repition-free and new. For example, you could learn the number pi to even longer lenghts forever, but doing that is not necessarily something new to know as it’s just a manifestation of a repition which was already discovered.)

        I’m intrigued how you would explain that economies could grow independently of resources. From my perspective, it looks a lot like each and every form of economy relies somehow on some form of resource or resources. As resources are finite, economies can’t grow forever.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are already trends showing economic growth disconnected from both resources and energy. Welcome to the service economy

          • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Service needs workforce performing the service. Workforce are usually human resources. Thereby, limited again. Or did I get it wrong?

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That reality is not defined by our wishes, but by observable, verifiable facts.

    Sadly, a large amount of people cannot accept this.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You cannot achieve any good by hurting people.

    People are so convinced that if we’re more cruel to criminals, they’ll stop committing crimes, or if we’re harsher to workers, we’ll work harder, or if you’re tough on border controls, immigrants will go away. It does not work and it cannot work.

  • MilitantVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That carnism is an extremely entrenched mass psychosis or mania, and an insane amount of people need to sober the fuck up.

  • seatwiggy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Chrome is a browser. Google is a website. They are not the same. It flabbergasts me anytime I find out that someone I know doesn’t know what a browser is.

  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Conspiracies that require absolute lock tight secrecy to function at a basic level aren’t generally tenable to be sustained for longer than a handful of years at a time at most. Somebody always fucks up or basically was just lucky nobody checked for awhile. The nessesity of any large scale collaboration creates inefficiencies and potential error points in the system. Even the best of the best spy agencies fuck up and get caught rather routinely, particularly when operating on their home soil. A lot of investigative journalists accidentally trip over stuff all the time but have good faith arrangements (or in some places laws) to not disclose the active manoeuvres of the state to the public.

    It’s just really hard for humans in general to accept that events that effected them or things they care about very deeply personally weren’t somehow also grand in design. Grocking sometimes it really is just random chance or stupid mishandling is not something we’re well wired to handle. Stories of all powerful conspiracies masterminding the world scratch that itch… But logistically speaking the conspiracy aspect is completely unnecessary. If someone is trying to blame a nebulous bogeymen who exists as nameless, numberless ultimately wealthy but also totally off the books super spies… chances are they are just trying to capitalize on making you feel flattered, smart and empowered by something “only you are smart enough to believe” - while feeding you bullshit they can personally profit from in some way with you none the wiser.

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    stronger products need less advertising, so an over-advertised product is likely inferior.