Context: Donald Trump spewing bullshit about annexing Canada and Greenland. Meanwhile, Congress has been dragging their feet for YEARS on resolving Puerto Rico’s territorial status.

Citizens living in US territories do not receive equal representation in congress. For instance, PR has one “delegate” to the House (not an official voting member) and no senators. Taxation without representation.

Although, at this point I wouldn’t blame PR if they changed their minds about wanting to become the 51st state.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just heads up, pointing this out makes his cult happier, they fully want him to snub a Hispanic territory for a country that says ‘speak white’ to other European languages also originating from white people.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “You’ll never have to vote again” was, I believe, the quote, so… Not to minimize this very real problem, but I think we all need to be worried about equal representation, right? 🤣😂😅😢

  • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    He keeps saying he wants to make Canada a state but we all know he means “territory” or at least that’s what the ultimate outcome would be. The people around him are not dumb enough to create a new massive state with like 50 EC votes that would 100% vote Democrat.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fun battleship fact: all US battleships have been named after states except for one: BB-5, the USS Kearsarge. The original Kearsarge fought in the Civil War and sank the Confederate raider Alabama; ever since then the US Navy has always had a ship in commission named Kearsarge - presumably as a giant fuck you to the South for losing. BB-5 got the name in 1900, forever ruining an otherwise-perfect ship naming convention. For this reason, I support Puerto Rico becoming a state, but only if they rename themselves Kearsarge.

  • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If the US gives away Puerto Rico, a ton of technology companies will be in trouble due to citizen requirements. Like my company off shores a lot of engineering and IT work to PR.

  • theangryseal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s amazing to me that Hawaii has around half the population of Puerto Rico and still they aren’t a state.

    It’s sad.

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    For instance, PR has one “delegate” to the House (not an official voting member) and no senators. Taxation without representation.

    That’s the kinda stuff people have had to actively ignore in order to be surprised by current events. Like that’s straight up a colony. The thing the US used to be before allegedly abolishing the concept.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would think Puerto Rico is ready to no longer be a commonwealth, much less a state.

  • techclothes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pretty sure by 51st state he means Puerta Rico like status. If the entirety of Canada was considered 1 state it may as well be.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s no way he’d annex Canada then give them the right to vote. It would be 2 more Democratic Senators, a massive leftward shift in the House, and would have more electoral college votes than any other state - all going to the Dems.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s cool, I didn’t think Puerto Ricans had expressed a clear preference, but 56% is pretty good. What are we waiting for? Let’s define a path, let’s start walking it. Let’s chat about whether it’s the path they want.

    After a quick read on the issue, the biggest argument against was that Hispanics vote Democrat. But now that Trump broke that trend, maybe now’s the time to get Republicans on board.

    Both mainland us and PR have a lot to offer each other. PR can benefit from more investment in their economy, healthcare, infrastructure, etc, we can benefit from both a slight change in perspective, additional business and tourism opportunities, etc.

    • sfu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      From what I’ve always heard, most people there weren’t interested in being an actual state.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Like I said, that was my impression as well, but it appears the last referendum had 56% in favor. I don’t know if that’s enough for a significant change in government but it’s clearly enough to take seriously. It’s enough that I hope there is a clear process and clear thresholds to progress in whatever direction the people want, and most of all I wish the US wasn’t an obstruction to whichever direction they want to go.