• Hikuro-93@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Did not see this one coming, for sure. /s

    Bet the ultrarich tax breaks are marked with a bright red “Priority No. 1” though, right? 🥸

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well yeah, that’s the order of strategies…

      Step 1: Tax cuts for the rich.

      Step 2: Declare and win wars with… Canada, Greenland, Mexico, Panema, China, Palestine, Ukrane.

      step 3: Attempt to completely eliminate the national debt. by cutting all services and regulations.

      I’m sure another dozen steps… but trust me, those of us making under 150k are on the list.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, everyone earning less than 150k will have no taxes and everyone earning more than 150k will have no taxes. Who the fuck will be paying taxes?

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    To be clear, the TCJA adds 4.5 Trillion in deficit. The Trump admin promises but has utterly failed to come close to cutting 2 Trillion in deficit by dismantling government systems and services.

    Unless they magically conjure 2.5 Trillion dollars from thin air without borrowing a single dollar from the Treasury, the budget will never be balanced. That is the plan.

  • 467265654C75696769@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Right after he drops the major greatest and bestest healthcare plan called “Obamacare Replacement”, everyone is saying the healthcare plan is the universally humongous and very very super nice.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    is that mythical balanced budget gonna happen before or after you steal more from future generations by piling trillions onto the national debt to give handouts to the rich… ?

  • 𝔗𝔢𝔯 𝔐𝔞𝔵𝔦𝔪𝔞@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a leftist, if he were to actually do this, it generally seems like a good idea to me. (Although 150K is probably too high)

    Disregarding the rest of his policies, are there any leftist arguments why this particular measure would be a bad idea ?

    (Please respond politely. This doesn’t mean I like Trump, I still think he’s evil and stupid. But even Hitler himself had at least one good idea : being vegetarian.)

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Setting aside the fact that he’s lying

      You’d have to make up the lost tax revenue from somewhere. Either by increasing or creating some other tax, or by cutting spending.

      The programs that would be likely to be cut are ones that poor people need. And he’s likely to try and throw down a federal sales tax, which loads a higher tax burden on poor people.

      Without those details, “eliminating federal income tax for people making under $X” cannot be qualified as good or bad. You must define the other parts of the equation.

    • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Depends on how the income is replaced for the federal government.

      If you look at income taxes as a way for the federal government to keep things running for all citizens to enjoy, you could argue that every citizen should pay a fixed even amount, roughly $15k a year. (based on 2024 IRS Income tax collection and estimated population)

      Federal minimum wage makes ~15k a year so minimum wage jobs turn into basically slavery for the feds where the slaves are homeless. The average family of 5 in the US, who have a mean income somewhere around 70k now owe 75k in taxes putting them and any poorer families into debt with the government, before being able to feed, cloth, and house themselves and all other taxes are off the table.

      As it stands right now, single filers making 90k AGI owe about 15k so people making less than that are basically being subsidized by anyone making more.

      If you keep the IRS income tax revenue the same, but apply it to only earners of 150k+ AGI you have ~20% of the population shouldering the full $5.1T income tax. Spread that evenly and now they would owe 70k per person (currently they owe ~29k) You can play the tax bracket game again to slowly ease people into paying that amount, you’re only increasing the amount of taxes being paid by the higher earners. If that’s what would actually happen, then sure this is can be a good thing to help bolster the economy in terms of more money flowing between citizens, but there’s no way in hell this administration will raise taxes on the higher earners in the US.

      If Trump did this, what would be more likely is the income revenue gets replaced by sales taxes and tariffs which is closer to the first scenario I described where the federal income is more evenly distributed among all citizens, working or otherwise.

      And the revenue will have to get replaced, the federal government subsidizes the fuck out of almost everything and even the 1%ers do not want a reality where the DoD isn’t issuing multi billion dollar contracts. You can’t make a living scraping off the top of contracts when there are no more contracts. Trump and co. celebrating millions of dollars saved by the federal government aren’t even making scratches against current revenue from income taxes, it’s political theater just like this tweet