• jaschop@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    First I thought “Oh jeez, what a wall of text” but now you gave me my own thoughts that I want to share.

    I don’t think callling genAI output “not art” is a very defendable statement. I believe art is ultimately a type of activity, and one that is very hard to draw a strict line around. If I find a cool piece of driftwood and frame it, did I do art? That’s kind of what that artist did when he picked his album cover.

    But I also share your sentiment about “AI artists” pretending to work in a medium of which they understand 0% of the nuance. I think it makes more sense to call those people hacks instead of “not artists”, because that’s what you call people who use shallow, formulaic methods to dabble in a medium of which they are wholly incompetent.

    And finally, AI as toolset does of course uniquely pander to hacks.

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree. There is intent going into the prompt fondler’s efforts to prompt the genAI, it’s just not very well developed intent and it is using the laziest shallowest method possible to express itself.