• Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Doesn’t most of the world already work like this? I have to identify myself to vote in my country, it’s the obvious way to prevent people from voting more than one time.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      The key is what id would be acceptable.

      They’ll raise the bar until only ids most people (they don’t like) don’t have and they have already destroyed the public service so getting one will ve very very hard and/or expensive

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Interestingly, it may backfire on them. For example they cite Real Id or passport.

        So passport only people who travel internationally bother to get. The rural MAGAs are less likely to get this.

        For Real Id, it’s more likely since that can be done with your license, however most people I know who do not fly have not bothered, because it’s a hassle, they have to find DMV acceptable materials for a feature they don’t even need (if you aren’t flying, you still won’t need real id for much of anything).

    • ptu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yeah I don’t get it either. Every election I voted in I’ve had to have id. It’s been like this for a long time and it hasn’t shifted so that we need proof of ethnicity or some other bs people here are suggesting will happen next.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Are people really not aware of the issues with voter ID laws? Do we really need to go over this basic shit again?

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          What are these issues? Every other country in the world ids voters.

          I’m not Trump fan by any means but it’s hard to argue against voter ID. Americans in general seem to live in 3rd world when it comes to IDs with your social security number shit etc.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            In person voter fraud is so statistically inconsequential that it might as well not exist. The idea that this is meant to prevent voter fraud is preposterous. It’s just pretense.

            All this does is create more hurdles for people who already have difficulty voting from decades of disenfranchisement. It’s the goal of these laws, and Republican politicians have literally admitted it.

            How do you get an ID if you don’t have an address? They can’t win with policy, and high voter turnout always means the results skew left, so they focus on stopping people of certain demographics from voting altogether.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              It’s not about voting fraud but your entire culture being so crippled by fear that you avoid basic societal structures that are accepted as a net positive literally everywhere else. Maybe it’s time to stand up for yourself?

          • Flic@mstdn.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            @drmoose @prole The UK only just brought it in a few years ago, against the advice of the Elec Commission as we don’t really have any fraud and we don’t have universal ID cards so it’s complicated to know what you’d need to bring. Mostly it’s passports or driving licences which relies on people having the cash to drive or travel, and their name matching the voter roll. If someone is turned away for not having ID they might not come back.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              Maybe its time to join the 21st century and issue citizen ids?

              No wonder identity theft and scams are so rampant in the US.

              • Flic@mstdn.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 days ago

                @drmoose it was discussed in the 00s (in the UK!) but was massively polarising and got dropped. People didn’t like the idea of having to carry something that proved who they are.

                • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  24 days ago

                  That’s just crazy to me. How can society function when people are afraid to identify themselves to officials they should be trusting and relying on.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            We had a whole civil rights movement about it. Jim Crow. MLK Jr. The laws are specifically intended to apply selective enforcement. That is their entire purpose. Why do you think these laws are always proposed by Republicans?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Every election I voted in I’ve had to have id.

        I’m currently trying to get my newborn son a passport, as the offices that handle this - SSA, Post Office, etc - are rapidly being dismantled by DOGE. I have no idea how we’ll be able to maintain or renew our documentation in coming years, given that there’s simply not going to be anyone to stamp the forms and mail me renewed papers at this rate.

        it hasn’t shifted so that we need proof of ethnicity or some other bs

        It specifically has for transgender people. We’ve seen both state and national rules changes that no longer recognize change of gender identity on forms. So a person who shows up to vote with a form that shows “Man” when presenting as a Woman is prime target for disenfranchisement.

        We’re also increasingly seeing Hispanic and Arab people targeted for arrest and imprisonment, purely on an individual not currently carrying ID (and - in many cases - despite this fact). It isn’t hard to imagine this persecution continuing into the next election cycle, with DHS agents grabbing people at polling stations.

        • ptu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Thank you for your insight. I hadn’t realized how obtaining an id could be an issue. We just use our driver’s licence (issued by the police) which most of us have already at hand. Wish you and the family all the best.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I live in a country where every citizen automatically receives a government id at the age of 12. We have to bring that id when we go to vote, but even if I were to lose the card at the worst possible time, there are contingency measures to allow me to still cast my vote. The idea is to get as many people as possible to vote, the id card greatly facilitates this process, but it’s not used as a tool to keep people from voting.

      In the usa (and the uk, and maybe other countries as well), citizens are not automatically granted an id card. Instead they have to acquire + maintain some accepted means of identifying themselves if they want to vote. And there some Americans saw a great opportunity: what if they made it so that certain minority groups would have a statistically harder time acquiring and maintaining identification that was deemed acceptable? And what if the state government could arbitrarily purge voter lists based on data mined information? The voter id requirements are used not only for facilitating the voting process, but also for suppressing undesired votes.

      If you want some examples of usa voter suppression: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_suppression_in_the_United_States

    • FamiNES@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Problem is, when the riots do eventually start, there will be no going back. One way or another this will be a completely different country in probably less than a year.

  • drthunder@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Here’s my general summary of why this is an issue: the US has been denying people the right to vote since day 1. You had to own land to vote in 1788. Half the country seceded and started a civil war that killed more of our citizens than any war since, over the right to own people. The 15th amendment was passed in 1870 to make it so you can’t deny Black people the right to vote, but places made it happen anyway. They made it so you had to pass a “literacy test” with intentionally ambiguous instructions, or pay a poll tax, or one of your grandparents had to have the ability to vote (afaik, the origin of the phrase “grandfathered in”).

    These were all legal until the 1960s. Lots of people here have parents who were alive before legislation was passed to end Jim Crow. Without that, the racists that be turned to the War on Drugs, because lots of places take away your right to vote if you’ve been convicted of a felony. They started passing voter ID laws and closing down DMVs in areas with lots of black people and reducing their hours. A politician in Wisconsin bragged after the 2016 election that these laws here threw the state to Trump. They’ve also started banning giving food and water to people in line to vote and throwing out mail-in votes that show up after election day.

    This isn’t about election security and it never has been; voter fraud has never changed an election in the country’s history. The real election fraud is in suppressing people’s votes and fucking with voting machines (2004) and having allies in positions of power to throw the election your way (2000). There’s more than that too, but it’s a tangent.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I mean I would argue the whole system of having to show up in person to a place to vote on a non-holiday day and wait in a long line is in of itself a way to stop poorer people from voting. I’ve lived in a state with only mail in voting for my whole life and as result we have some of the highest voter turn out. It makes sense the Republicans want to do everything they can to to alter that as the harder they make it for poorer people to vote the better their odds of winning are.

  • Redditsux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Trump is doing this to distract media attention from the biggest fuck-up of his administration so far, and there’s been a lot.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      That we know. That likely wasn’t the only signal chat group these idiots were using , and they probably still are.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      My first thought too. The timing is just too perfect.

      My second thought? This means that Trump’s team probably has executive orders just waiting in the wings, since they know how this all works. The only thing needed to supplant even awful news cycles are even worse news cycles.

      My third thought? This means every time Team Trump royally messes up something, our only reward will be Team Trump doing something even worse, because it’s the only move they have, ever.

      Until we’re all dead by their or our own hands, presumably.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      the biggest fuck-up of his administration so far

      The biggest fuck-up of his administration this week.
      His administration is a scandal factory.
      They will fuck up and make a mess, and their solution is to make a bigger mess to distract from the one they just made.
      What about the bigger mess? Well I guess they’ll just have to make an even bigger mess to cover that one up.
      Rinse and repeat.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Call your local & state officals about this. The federal government does not run elections. It’s the state and local officals that do even for federal office. They are the ones who chose to follow or not follow a blatantly illegal order

    Trump is threatening to pull unrelated federal funding if they don’t, but he’s been pulling funding for many states anyways for zero reason. Make sure your local & state officals know you’ll have their back if they don’t bow down

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      The US system is so weird, federal elections are handled at a lower level of power and differently depending on which state you live in, it makes no sense. You guys need an independent body handling federal elections so everyone’s vote is handled the same way no matter where they live… And paper ballots, fucking hell you guys need to go back to paper ballots.

      • watty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        I think the states handling election in theory makes sense. It’s a decentralized system that is harder to undermine. An independent body may bring consistency, but I don’t think that helps at all in combatting Trump’s tampering.

        Also, many states are using paper ballots and always have been.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          Decentralization isn’t always better, it’s not as efficient and, in this case, it makes it so people’s ability to choose their president varies by state and in red states there’s scheming to prevent the Democrats from gaining ground.

          With an independent body and equal access to voting for all, Trump wouldn’t have been elected in the first place.

          You say it’s harder to undermine but it’s getting undermined while we don’t have issues like we see in the USA right next door in Canada.

          • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            The problem here isn’t efficiency though. Inefficiency I think is a reasonable trade off to make to prevent corruption at scale.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    This will get shot down faster than there can even be controversy. Founding fathers would be rolling in their graves, and there‘s no way the Supreme Court can squeeze that kind of interpretation out of the Constitution.

    That being said, it may give some state legislators cover to go with it.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Oh you sweet, sweet summer child…

      This has been a GOP wet dream for years. States and GOP legislators are going to cram this through by any means necessary. The Supreme Court has used medieval text from completely other countries in order to justify rulings and have openly said precedent doesn’t mean shit to them. These people will cram this through and smile while doing it.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          In western states, quite a few of the people are the fascists. Quite a few more are sympathetic to fascists. And those who work forces are regularly the ones who burn crosses.

          “If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”

          ― Malcolm X

          Needless to say, we live in a nation full of uncareful people.

              • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 days ago

                we have to stop making goose and gander comparisons. they’re sociopaths. we’re the good guys. it’s ok when the good guys do it.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  they’re sociopaths. we’re the good guys

                  They’re sociopaths, certainly. But they’re sociopaths who the liberal faction seem content (perhaps even eager) to roll over for.

                  I don’t see many good guys. Only the bad and the ugly.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Huh? We are presented with a choice between doing something and the end of democracy. Way I see it, its the system’s fault for putting bad choices in front of me, and the choices are, uh… equivalent, according to my internet sources. Maybe I’ll sit it out again.

      /s for the gifted triggered ones

  • vapeloki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    So? The idea itself is not inherently bad. If I want to vote in Germany I go to the local polling station, show my ID (proof if citizenship) and hand over my voting documents (so I can only vote once, also the volunteers will mark me on a list) and I vote. And no, I don’t have to register to vote.

    Your problem is that your common way of identifying is your damn drivers license and not an ID card like in nearly every other country.

    Not defending this big, orange, walking, talking and shaking with his little hands, asshole. Just saying, not all of your problems are caused by him. Many of them are inherent to your political system.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I am so FUCKING TIRED of naive sheltered Europeans with functioning democracies not taking 5 minutes to read American history to see why this is quite nearly the worst possible thing our government could do. Not worst as in “oooh it’s a mistake” but worst as in intentional evil.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I think if we get through this, we’ll look back at this in horror… for about 60 years, and then we’ll have a crop of neo-trumpists because no one ever seems to learn anything.