
I’m guessing it’s whatever the next 7 poorest states are but hard agree they should list them
I’m guessing it’s whatever the next 7 poorest states are but hard agree they should list them
It would be very strange at this point to not see him be forced to spin them off. I mean, this is the trump admin. Anything is possible, but this is egregious (and also it would benefit musk if he was forced to do so)
Containment was a myth. They’ve been everywhere else the whole time. They’re just forced to keep quiet on sites with moderation. This is only positive
There is no policy which discord could enact that could protect children because they’re not in the room with the child. What they want discord and other websites to do is impossible and not their job
I mean, it would make no sense to call me a bot so yeah
Wait I’m confused. Did you just admit to being a bot account?
North Korea is balmy too. I just don’t get why anyone would risk it
Being South American doesn’t make it any less likely to be put into a concentration camp for jaywalking
Despite recent events, the camps weren’t built with holding North Americans in mind…
I mean I guess but I’m more disturbed by the fact that they have so much tourism given the fact they’ve had concentration camps for years
Who the fuck was going to El Salvador?
Gestures vaguely at 2011 socal and then vaguely at today socal
More specifically Maga didn’t exist and conservatives were far less damaging, or at least less overtly damaging such that it was less socially acceptable to overtly despise them.
But again, I was a child and that at least colors my memory of 2011
Joy… Thank you for your help
The recontextualisation of this piece 14 years later is crazy
We were so naive (with the added context that I was still a child when this came out, lol)
Weird. You called me evil when I suggested it as the correct way to pay creatives and everyone else. Maybe your problem with my argument is your own reading comprehension.
That’s what I was thinking! Except last time I heard it a decade ago there wasn’t any actual evidence and it was only antivax homeschool weirdos talking about it. I’d love to hear from anyone who read the actual study to see if this is real this time. Not about to trust the same people that ran “a glass of wine a day is good for you” at one point. US news doesn’t have actual science communicators and their popsci headlines are universally trash
Edit having now read the guardian article: only proved my point. The only thing they cite is the California prop 65 which is absolutely useless as evidence of possible harm. I’m genuinely asking for the real paper or someone who read it here because nothing from OP is of any use and the guardian doesn’t cite their sources (which sucks! because it might be genuinely dangerous and I have no idea! I don’t want to poison myself but this very well could be bullshit!)
Lololololololololol. No. Unless you have a massively expensive GPU, no. The image is not being generated by your device. It’s being generated by a mile wide server bank that churns through petrochemicals like a city all on its own. That’s the part of AI people are talking about when they reference it being bad for the environment. And if you do own a massively expensive GPU and generate AI images offline, you are not part of the conversation because your activities are an ounce in an ocean.
Are you suggesting we should feel bad about something here?
I mean… Russia would own Ukraine by year three of this war and wouldn’t be using WW2 munitions if they were prepared and strong. There’s something to be said about the Russian military preparedness
It’s to make him look less round. He can look like a child or the obese old old man he is. Looking good isn’t one of the options
We’re talking about Republicans. having enough has never been a consideration to their greed
That came out 12 years ago