

Counterpoint: Not wearing a suit, at least in the first photo
Counterpoint: Not wearing a suit, at least in the first photo
Gilbert Gottfried
It’s grieve, the person with a hole in their chest 😆
It’s a Vow symbol
As I understand it, the protocol has the ability to decentralize built in. But the technical requirements are prohibitively high to the point only large businesses or corps could afford to do it. I also believe (someone correct me) the company hasn’t switched on the functionality yet.
Wait, so it is a genocide now?
He has a great one in this series for Home Alone. Completely changes the entire film
Cayde
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction(s). To summarize my request: I’d love to have a way to bundle multiple communities into a single section or feed in order to focus on a specific topic (and take breaks from… others). The obvious parallel from Reddit is a MultiReddit. For examples of how I use them:
I see this as one of the most useful and even powerful features of a community-based system like Lemmy. Would love to have this option here
Thanks for all the work you do. Is there a place we can make feature requests? I don’t want to clutter this thread if this isn’t the right place
In this economy??
It isn’t complicated: they’re racists and bigots. Their leaders figured out it’s much easier to control people when you unify them against a group of Others. People aren’t born racist, but they are tribal. And it’s easy to twist that affinity for one’s own group into evil and profit.
But that old marvel feeling came from doing the work of building up not just key heroes with their own movies (or sometimes collabs), but also the villain. Does Doom get his own film before the next Avengers? Or are they just dropping him on us?
Check out the English PhD motherfucker over here
snort
First time I’ve seen GAGA
A zip hoodie is the perfect article of clothing. Functional, comfortable, adaptable, expressive (optional)
Gotta wonder how long until he tries to fire the women from the Supreme Court
I feel like this kind of misses the point. To be clear: If someone absolutely cannot avoid installing slop apps and enabling notifications for everything, I can see their need for an ultra minimal device or other solution. But I also think that speaks to a larger, personal discussion about discipline and possibly addiction, but that’s outside the realm of this thread.
My point is we can choose which apps, notifications, features, and algorithms are allowed to get our attention. It’s easy to turn off all notifications or never even allow them in the first place—after all, apps have to ask for that permission in the first place.
But the choice is the point. If someone is traveling somewhere they probably want maps to tell them important information about the journey. Otherwise why turn on directions at all? That’s the entire point.
We even have the ability to disable all texting notifications but also choose to allow them from certain people if they’re important enough. These devices are simply tools and we have the power to choose how they operate. The device isn’t the problem, it’s our choices.
Your logic is undeniable