

Remember that interview with Don Lemon where Musk got heated over censorship?
Me too.
Remember that interview with Don Lemon where Musk got heated over censorship?
Me too.
I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves.
Google can only do that if they can maintain grip on the market. This requires the likes of Samsung to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels.
Google closing android would ruffle a lot of feathers so it definitely wouldn’t be a given they would come out of that on top.
Apple has no problem existing outside of Google’s sphere of influence. And honestly if the android market would split and you’d get legitimately google-less phones with large app stores that google doesn’t control that would be fairly beneficial if you ask me.
Trump: starts trade war
Trade partners leave the chat.
Trump: surprised pikachu
If google where to close android it’ll undoubtedly be forked. Pretty sure Graphene and Calyx will be fine.
Yeah, agree. Hence the crime against humanity stance.
Als je oprecht een aanleiding hebt om met mensen te willen praten, en “gewoon een gesprek” voeren ook echt alleen de basis is, stuur je maar een schrijftelijke uitnodiging hiertoe ofzo. En als mensen daar aan willen meewerken voer je dat gesprek via een onafhankelijke bemiddelaar.
Je stuurt niet zomaar onaangekondigd een uniform met een monopolie op geweld en, tot zekere hoogte, waarheid langs want dan snap je er gewoon niks van.
Data you get from people by using torture is automatically invalid, especially when it comes to getting people to “admit” things.
When are we finally going to consider this the war crime/crime against humanity it is?
The two look like boobs, and the three look like a penis
Due to the fact I’m essentially a 40 year old adolescent i have Olympic gold in seeing penises and (to a lesser extent) tits in everything, but you lost me here…
If this is is the answer it’ll take the cake as most abstract rendition ever.
Tech leaders who once backed Trump
Once, meaning, until about two months ago.
As much as I’d love to take this at face value, people taking a run with what an AI told them is highly problematic.
Explain to me me how “someone told you in private” would ever apply to this derrick leaking a group chat. What is private about a group chat?
Obviously I’m talking about the guy that forwarded juicy messages someone sent to him personally to his buddies in this leaked group chat.
Maybe I could have explained better. Maybe you’re a bit too eager to find people to recreationally chastise.
I think you think I’m agry with the wrong person. Who do you think my statement was directed against?
My problem was not with Derrick?
The abuse of trust is the problem there, not the trust itself…
There’s no scenario where you’re not the a-hole if you’re going to parrot something someone else told you in private, elsewhere.
I’ve definitely got some bleak ass humor with some friends in private but forwarding messages people sent you in private to other people and group chats? Really?
How this guy still has time for games and twitter is beyond me, considering he has like 800 children, 50 companies, and now is way deep up Trump’s rectum with his meme Doge department “saving Americans money”.
Also, Ubisoft being based. What a world.
Deal with what?
I was wondering why we haven’t seen any actual data on how they’ve saved the US money yet. The answer is likely that they didn’t.
This is some Avengers level bullshit.